Tuesday, 23, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaitan Singh @ Tillu S/O Prahlad vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 76 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 76 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Shaitan Singh @ Tillu S/O Prahlad vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 January, 2023
Bench: Farjand Ali
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Cr. Misc. Application for Suspension of Sentence
                               No.599/2022

                                       in

          S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2021/2022

Shaitan Singh @ Tillu S/o Prahlad, Aged About 24 Years, R/o
Soorwal P.s. Soorwal District Sawai Madhopur (At Present
Confined In Central Jail, Sewar Bharatpur)
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P
                                                                ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Tarun Jain
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP



             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

                                    Order

03/01/2023

Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and learned

Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence

and perused the judgment impugned dated 15.11.2022 passed by

Additional Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur in Criminal No.

66/2022 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the

judgment dated 07.06.2022 passed by Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate (Railways) Kota, Camp Swawai Madhopur in Criminal

Case No. 14065/2018 has been dismissed. As per the order dated

07.06.2022, the accused-petitioner has been convicted for the

offence punishable under sections 4/25 of the Arms Act and has

been sentenced with one year simple imprisonment along with fine

of Rs. 1,000/-.

(2 of 3) [SOSA 599/2022]

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the

evidence with respect to recovery of the alleged arms is not up to

the mark and therefore, no reliance can be placed on it. He was

on bail during the entire course of the trial but the liberty was

never misused. Therefore, the application for suspension of

sentence may be granted.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the

prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner for

releasing the petitioner on application for suspension of sentence.

Considering the overall submissions of the parties and

looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case while

refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the

matter and the defects of the prosecution as the same may put an

adverse effect on hearing of the revision petition, this court is of

the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence

awarded to the accused-petitioner.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate (Railways) Kota, Camp Swawai Madhopur vide

judgment dated 07.06.2022 in Regular Criminal Case No.

14065/2018 against the appellant-petitioner-Shaitan Singh @

Tillu S/o Prahlad shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 13.02.2023 and

(3 of 3) [SOSA 599/2022]

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the revision on the

conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the revision petition is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case, the said

accused-applicant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J

Pcg/120

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : LL

 
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter