Tuesday, 23, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh Kumar Poonia vs The State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 157 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 157 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mukesh Kumar Poonia vs The State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2023
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19515/2022

1. Mukesh Kumar Poonia S/o Balwant Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Thirpali Bari, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu, Rajasthan.

2. Vidhyadhar S/o Bhawar Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No.3, Sarpanch Bas, Bhukhredi, District Churu, Rajasthan.

3. Seema Kumari Regar D/o Ratan Lal Regar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 13, Village Pur, Regar Mohalla, Pansal, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

4. Manmohan Singh Charan S/o Arjun Singh Charan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Jalwana, Tehsil Merta City,district Nagaur, Rajasthan.

5. Mohammed Mazhar Baig S/o Shareef Baig, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Bahated, Tehsil Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

6. Mohammed Adil Shirvani S/o Abdul Quadir Shirvani, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Shirvani Mohalla, Jhajhari Baag Ke Pass, Ward No. 1, Bolni, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

7. Asif Khan S/o Alamgeer, Aged About 99 Years, R/o Village Berkhandi, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan, Rajasthan.

8. Mohammed Amjad Khan S/o Mohammed Usman, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 199 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Bahted, Tehsil Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

9. Mahammad Tasleem S/o Vakeel Ahmmad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Udai Kalan, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

10. Hemlata Gohil D/o Babu Singh Gohil, Aged About 99 Years, R/o 924 Purviya Mohalla, Bhagwat Garh, Chouth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

11. Sanjay Pal S/o Ramavtar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Near Sultana Road, Loyal, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

12. Amit Kumar Verma S/o Radheshyam Verma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kahtik Mohalla Suket, Tehsil Ramganj Mandi, District Kota, Rajasthan.

(2 of 4) [CW-19515/2022]

13. Shyam Lal Bairwa S/o Jagan Lal Bairwa, Aged About 99 Years, R/o 453 Bairwa Mohalla, Sop, District Karoli, Rajasthan.

14. Rajendra Prasad Acharya S/o Mool Chand Acharya, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Chirana, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

15. Rajendra Kumar Jangid S/o Ramjee Lal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Nehru Colony, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.

16. Pavan Kumar Verma S/o Bal Chand, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Koli Mohalla, Aklera, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

17. Pravin Yadav S/o Shishupal Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 165 Panchmukhi Balaji Ke Samne, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

18. Dinesh Kumar Dangi S/o Prabhu Lal Dangi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Gopalpura, Post Rijnon, Tehsil Bakani, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

19. Shakil S/o Abdul Majeed, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Jharjhari Bag Ke Pass, Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

20. Kamlesh Jhanjhar D/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Choudhary Jhanjhoro Ki Dhani, Sursura, Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.

21. Kamlesh Kumari Gurjar D/o Bhairu Lal Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 37, Ward No.8, Odhandha, Bundi, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

22. Sunita Meena D/o Moti Lal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bhimganj, Tehsil Hindoli, Bundi, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

23. Anita Bai Jat D/o Ramdayal Choudhary W/o Siyaram Choudhary, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village And Post Darda Hind, District Tonk, Rajasthan.

24. Jyoti Roi D/o Mukund Lal Roi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o New Kotwali Ke Piche, Agrasen Colony, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

25. Rama Choudhary D/o Dayaram Choudhary, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Meer Nagar, Sankhna, District Tonk, Rajasthan.

26. Geeta Devi Ghaushlaya D/o Bhanwar Lal Ghaushlaya W/o Prem Singh Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhani

(3 of 4) [CW-19515/2022]

Buradkan, 421 Jhag, District Jaipur, Rajasthan

27. Yashwant Kumar S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/ o House No. 2 Aadarsh School Ke Pass, Ramganj Mandi, District Kota, Rajasthan.

28. Sunita Jat D/o Puranmal Jat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No.8, Village Chatarura, Tehsil Bansur District Alwar, Rajasthan.

29. Rasal Bai Meena D/o Nathoo Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Latoda, Post Galad Kanla, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

30. Rajesh Kumar S/o Dulichand, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post Haripura, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

31. Heena Koushar D/o Shabbir Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Talab Ki Pal Ke Pass, Badnore, Bhilwara District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director (Non Gazette), Medical And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Hans Raj Nimbar
For Respondent(s)         :     -



                     JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                     Order

05/01/2023

1.    Learned   counsel       for   the     petitioners          submits   that   the

petitioners would feel satisfied if a direction is issued to the

respondents to decide their representation dispassionately in the

light of the judgments dated 08.02.2012 rendered in the case of

Ashok Kumar Baser Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP

(4 of 4) [CW-19515/2022]

No.6707/2007) and dated 10.7.2017 rendered in the case of Om

Prakash Beniwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (SBCWP

No.8204/2014).

2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed

of with the direction to the respondents to decide petitioners'

representation in the light of the judgments passed by this Court

in the cases of Ashok Kumar Baser and Om Prakash Beniwal

(supra).

3. For the purpose aforesaid, the petitioners may file a fresh

representation along with all relevant material including copies of

the judgments aforesaid along with certified copy of the order

instant, within a period of two weeks from today. The respondents

are directed to consider petitioners' representation in accordance

with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioners' representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 85-pooja/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : LL

 
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter