Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1025 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2023
[2023/RJJP/000925]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1253/2022
Subash Suradia S/o Shri Lalchand Suradia, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Village Jat Gavada, Post Jakhrana, Tehsil Behror, District
Alwar (Raj.).
----Appellant
Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through
Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Parivahan Marg,
Jaipur.
2. The Member Secretary, Service Selection Board,
R.S.R.T.C., Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.
3. The Acting Director (Transporation), R.S.R.T.C.,
Headquarter Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
31/01/2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant.
2. This intra-court appeal has been preferred against the
judgment and order dated 02.09.2022, by which the Writ Court
has dismissed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4567/2022-Subash
Suradia Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation &
Ors.
3. The petitioner-appellant was a candidate for the post of
Conductor pursuant to the Advertisement No.153 dated
03.03.2010. He was not selected, therefore, he filed the above
[2023/RJJP/000925] (2 of 2) [SAW-1253/2022]
writ petition and the same has been dismissed on the ground of
delay as it was preferred after ten years of the selection.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant in order to
explain delay submits that he had filed one writ petition i.e. S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.2731/2012 also in this regard and the same
was disposed of vide judgment and order dated 06.03.2012 with
liberty to the petitioner to make a representation, which shall be
considered within a period on one month from its receipt.
5. The submission is that till date the representation filed by
the petitioner-appellant has not been decided.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant further submits
that as his representation was not decided, he had preferred
another writ petition i.e. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12315/2014,
which was disposed of on 29.11.2016 in terms of the order passed
in Special Appeal Writ No.1396/2012, Vishnu Lal Sen Vs. RSRTC &
Ors.
7. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present
writ petition appears to be third petition virtually for the same
cause of action. It is well settled that successive writ petitions are
not permitted for the same cause of action.
8. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are of
the opinion that the Writ Court has rightly refused to entertain the
petition. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ MITHAL),CJ
KAMLESH KUMAR/RAJAT/3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!