Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10805 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:43984-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1031/2023
IN
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2789/2013.
1. Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited (AVVNL) through its
Managing Director, City Power House, Hati Bhata, District
- Ajmer, Rajasthan, now located at Vidyut Bhawan,
Panchsheel Nagar, District - Ajmer, Rajasthan.
2. Chief Engineer (Commercial), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam
Limited, City Power House, Hati Bhata, District - Ajmer
Rajasthan, now located at Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel
Nagar, District - Ajmer, Rajasthan.
3. Senior Accounts Officer, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam
Limited, City Power House, Hati Bhata, District - Ajmer
Rajasthan, now located at Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel
Nagar, District - Ajmer, Rajasthan.
----Appellants
Versus
J.K. Tyre and Industries Limited [Formerly known as J.K.
Industries Limited] Having its Registered Office at 7, Council
House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 and Factory at Jay Kay Gram
Kankroli, District- Rajsamand, Rajasthan. Through its Vice
President (Finance) & Authorized Signatory Anil Mishra S/o
Yogendra Nath Mishra, Aged 46 years, Resident of A-7, Jay Kay
Colon, Kankroli, District-Rajsamand, Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vinay Kothari
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Pareek
(Downloaded on 16/12/2023 at 08:42:27 PM)
[2023:RJ-JD:43984-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-1031/2023]
HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Judgment
15/12/2023
1. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the
cause title contains many typographical mistakes, therefore, an
amended cause title has been filed.
2. The amended cause title is taken on record in substitution of
the cause title already on record.
3. As issue raised in this appeal has already been decided in
similar appeal, despite there being defects, we are inclined to
dispose of this appeal also.
4. Heard.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that while
disposing off the writ petition by impugned order, the learned
Single Judge has not considered that even though the respondent
writ petitioner was required to pay the water conservation cess
and electricity duty, which liability remained suspended because of
the operation of the interim order, the delay in payment now
would also invite payment of late payment surcharge.
6. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent on advance notice
would submit that this point was neither raised nor decided by the
learned Single Judge because this was not an issue.
7. Be that as it may, we find that the issue which is now being
raised by the appellants before this Court now, falls for
consideration by the learned Single Judge.
[2023:RJ-JD:43984-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-1031/2023]
8. Without commenting upon the merits, this Court is inclined
to disposed off the appeal while leaving it open for the appellants
to apply for review before the learned Single Judge. We may
hasten to add that we have not commented upon the merits of the
case. Limitation will not come as an impediment in seeking review
if the application is filed within a period of thirty days from today.
9. Disposed off accordingly.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACJ
S101-Mohan/Divya
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!