Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satish Singh Rathore vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:42464)
2023 Latest Caselaw 10469 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10469 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Satish Singh Rathore vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:42464) on 6 December, 2023

[2023:RJ-JD:42464]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18710/2023

Satish Singh Rathore S/o Keshav Rao Ji, Aged About 64 Years,
H.no. - 476, C - Block Sector No. - 9, Savina, Udaipur (Raj.)
313002. Last Posted As Health Inspector At Block Chief Medical
And Health Officer, Sarada, District - Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                                          ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Medical And
         Health Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2.       The Joint Director (Administration), Medical And Health
         Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3.       The     Chief        Medical       And       Health         Officer,   Udaipur
         (Rajasthan).
4.       Block       Chief    Medical       Officer,      Phc,       Sarada,    Udaipur
         (Rajasthan).
5.       The Government Of Rajasthan, Directorate, Pension And
         Pensioners Welfare Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6.       The     Joint       Director,     Regional         Office,      Pension   And
         Pensioners Welfare Department, Udaipur (Raj.).
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. Rajesh Shah for
                                    Mr. Naveen Mohan Vyass
For Respondent(s)              :



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order

06/12/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment dated 21.07.2023 of this Court at Jaipur Bench rendered

[2023:RJ-JD:42464] (2 of 3) [CW-18710/2023]

in batch of writ petition led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.21/2020 (Vijay Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.). The

operative part of the said order is reproduced as under :-

"41. Hence, looking to the binding effect of

above judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of C.P. Mundinamani(supra) and All

India Judges Association (supra), it is

held that the petitioners would be entitled to

get the benefits of increment falling due on

1st July on account of their conduct for the

requisite length of time i.e. one year. The

petitioners would be entitled to get notional

payment on 1st July, notwithstanding their

superannuation on 30th June.

42. The respondents are directed to consider

the case of the petitioners afresh in the light

of the observations made hereinabove and

thereafter grant notional increment to the

petitioners. The petitioners' pension would

consequently be refixed. The appropriate

orders be issued and the arrears of pension

be paid to the petitioners within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of

certified copy of this order.

43. With the aforesaid directions, all these

petitions stand disposed of.

44. Stay applications and all applications

(pending, if any) also stand disposed of".

[2023:RJ-JD:42464] (3 of 3) [CW-18710/2023]

Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioners may

be permitted to file a detailed representation before the

competent authorities for redressal of their grievances.

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed

with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the

competent authority of the department and the competent

authority of the department is directed to decide the same within

a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such

representation, keeping in mind the judgment in the case of Vijay

Singh (supra).

Stay application also stands disposed of.

The instant order has been passed based on the submissions

made in the petition. The respondents would be free to examine

the veracity of the stand of the petitioner in accordance with law.

(ARUN MONGA),J 76-divyaP/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter