Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Indra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:42105)
2023 Latest Caselaw 10383 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10383 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Indra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:42105) on 4 December, 2023

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2023:RJ-JD:42105]

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 7078/2023
Mukesh S/o Masulal Banjara, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Devipura, P.s. Jeeran, District Neemuch (MP)
(At Present Lodged At District Jail, Chittorgarh)
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                  ----Respondent
                              Connected With
  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 7079/2023
Indra Singh S/o Kishore, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Devipura,
P.s. Jeeran, District Neemuch (M.P.)
(At Present Lodged At District Jail , Chittorgarh)
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                  ----Respondent
  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 11088/2023
Dharmendra S/o Babu Lal Banjara, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Devipura, P.s. Jeeran, Dist. Neemuch(M.P.)
(Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh)
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr.Ravindra Kumar Charan.
                                Mr.Neeraj Kumar Gurjar.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr.Shrawan Kumar, P.P.


        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
                       ORDER

04/12/2023

These applications for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have

been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection

with FIR No.239/2020 registered at Police Station Sadar

Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, for offences under Sections 8/15,

25 and 29 of NDPS Act.

[2023:RJ-JD:42105] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7078/2023]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

petitioners are in judicial custody since 27.8.2020. Learned

counsel submitted that the contraband (poppy straw) weighing

98.600 kgs was recovered from one Bolero Pickup vehicle bearing

registration No.MP43-BD-0693 when it was in transit. Learned

counsel submitted that the co-accused Arjun Banjara was found

sitting on the wheel of the offending vehicle, whereas the present

petitioners were sitting as co-passengers with him. Learned

counsel submitted that the petitioners had no knowledge about

illicit poppy straw being transported in the offending vehicle by the

co-accused Arjun Banjara. Learned counsel submitted that the

Investigating Officer has not collected any evidence which can

establish that the present petitioners had any knowledge about

contraband being transported in the offending vehicle.

It was further urged that the petitioners were neither the

owners of the offending vehicle nor any evidence has come on

record attributing knowledge to them regarding use of the

offending vehicle for transporting the contraband.

Learned counsel submitted that the co-accused Babu Lal has

already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated

27.4.2021 passed in S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.4151/2021.

Lastly, placing reliance on the judgment dated 28.03.2023

rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the cases of Mohd

Muslim @ Hussain Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) in Special Leave

Petition (Crl.) No(s).915 of 2023 and Rabi Prakash Vs.

State of Orisa (Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.4169/2023

learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial

[2023:RJ-JD:42105] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7078/2023]

custody for more than three years and the delay in trial is not

attributable to them, therefore, the delay in trial can also be

considered for releasing the accused persons on bail despite

restrictions imposed under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Learned

counsel thus implored the Court to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail

application and submitted that looking to the seriousness of the

accusation levelled against the petitioners, the bail applications

deserve to be dismissed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case particularly the fact that nothing has

come on record indicating that the petitioners who were travelling

in the offending vehicle as co-passengers had any knowledge

about the contraband being transported therein coupled with the

custody period of the petitioners and in view of the judgments

passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Mohd. Muslim

@ Hussain (supra) and Rabi Prakash (supra), this Court prima

facie finds that the conditions contained in Section 37 of the NDPS

Act are satisfied. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/

demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners- (i)

Mukesh S/o Masulal Banjara, (ii) Indra Singh S/o Kishore

and (iii) Dharmendra S/o Babu Lal Banjara shall be enlarged

[2023:RJ-JD:42105] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7078/2023]

on bail in connection with FIR No.239/2020 registered at Police

Station Sadar Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, provided each of

them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with

two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned

trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all

the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations

made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail

application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

A copy of this order be placed in each file.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J /tarun goyal/

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter