Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10291 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:41361]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18508/2023
1. Sunayana Swarnakar W/o Mayank Kumar Swarnkar, Aged
About 29 Years, Rameshwar Marriage Garden, Jhareda
Road, Hindauncity, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
2. Parwati Sarnkar W/o Sandeep Swarnkar, Aged About 27
Years, Ramdas Ki Tal, Hindauncity, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
3. Manvendra Singh Tomar S/o Satwant Singh Tomar, Aged
About 31 Years, 134/1, Jat Patti Peepalheda, Tihariya,
District Karauli, Rajasthan.
4. Prithvi Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 28 Years,
Beda (Banki), Bajna, Hindauncity, Karauli, Rajasthan.
5. Hitesh Sharma S/o Mahendra Sharma, Aged About 21
Years, 11, Mangi Pura, Hukmi Khera, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
6. Rashmi Chaudhary D/o Rajendra Chaudhary, Aged About
24 Years, Vpo Kheda (Jamalpur), Tehsil Hindauncity,
District Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Surendra Singh S/o Kaptan Singh Gurjar, Aged About 25
Years, Village Bhikki Ka Pura, Tehsil Suroth, District
Karauli, Rajasthan.
8. Vishnu Kumar Dagur S/o Ram Kunmar, Aged About 28
Years, Vpo Cinayata, Tehsil Suroth, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
9. Pushpendra Kalar S/o Visamvhar Dayal, Aged About 38
Years, Vpo Suroth, Tehsil Suroth, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, Primary Education, Karauli.
4. The District Education Officer, Primary Education,
Gangapurcity.
5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Karauli.
(Downloaded on 02/12/2023 at 08:41:15 PM)
[2023:RJ-JD:41361] (2 of 3) [CW-18508/2023]
6. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Gangapurcity.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hans Raj Nimbar
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
01/12/2023
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely
covered by a judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.13935/2023 (Dashrath Singh & Ors. Vs. State
of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 18.09.2023, in the following
terms:-
"1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioners have raised a grievance that at the time of initial appointment, they had chosen District Jalore as their preference and they were accorded posting in such district, however, after creation of District Sanchore as anew district, their area of posting has fallen under District Sanchore. The petitioners want to have their posting in District Jalore.
2. It is the contention of the petitioners that opportunity to fill option forms for changing preferred district have been given to similar employees by the Director, Secondary Education, however, no such opportunity has been given to the petitioners, who want to remain in District Jalore, though their area of posting after creation of District Sanchore falls under Sanchore.
3. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation before the Director, Secondary Education along with certified copy of the order instant and requisite documents, including the notification creating District Sanchore as a separate district.
4. In case, any representation along with the certified copy of the order instant is addressed, the Director, Secondary Education shall consider petitioners' representation in accordance with law and call for option
[2023:RJ-JD:41361] (3 of 3) [CW-18508/2023]
from the petitioners within a period of one month from today.
5. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
6. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly."
2. For the self same reasons, the present writ petition is also
disposed of in the same terms as in the case of Dashrath Singh
(supra).
3. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of
accordingly.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J. 56-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!