Devraj Singh Ranawat vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 11330 Raj

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13218/2022

1. Devraj Singh Ranawat S/o Shri Girdhari Singh Ranawat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Rajpoot Mohallah, Gram Gangas, Post Railmagra, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

2. Maan Singh Meena S/o Shri Sohan Lal Ji Meena, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Pipaliyan (Kallan), Post Jaliyan, Tehsil Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bhadesar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Patel.

For Respondent(s)         :



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

                                     Order

12/09/2022

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by

order of this Court in Satdev v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.9899/2019, decided on 25.7.2019, wherein,

this Court inter alia came to conclusion and directed as under:-

"In view thereof, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in light of judgment in the case of Om Prakash (supra). The petitioner may make a

(2 of 2) [CW-13218/2022]

representation to the respondents pointing out the requisite dates etc., based on which, the respondents would deal with the representation while according notional benefits to the petitioner from the date persons similarly situated to the petitioner, were accorded appointment by the respondents.

Needful may be done by the respondents within a period of four weeks from the date such representation alongwith a copy of this order is placed by the petitioner before the respondents."

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by

the petitioner is allowed with similar directions as given in the

case of Satdev (supra).

The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner

would be entitled to the relief.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 196-pradeep/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)