Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11281 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 120/2022
Lrs Of Dharma
----Appellant Versus Roshani
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ganga Ram For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
09/09/2022
IA No.1/22
Heard on application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC for taking
on record the legal representatives of appellant-Dharma Ram on
record.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the
pendency of the Civil Regular Appeal pending before the Additional
District Judge No.2, Nohar, the appellant was expired on
19.11.2018, however, his legal representatives could not be taken
on record and the learned lower appellate Court vide impugned
judgment and decree dated 07.09.2021 rejected the appeal
preferred by Dharma Ram.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the
legal representatives were not taken on record, therefore, the
present appeal has been preferred by the legal representatives of
Dharma Ram. It is also submitted that alongwith the said appeal,
the present application under Order 22 Rule 3 read with Section
(2 of 2) [CSA-120/2022]
151 of the CPC has also been filed for taking on record the legal
representatives of the appellant-Dharma Ram.
In view of submissions made in the application, the
application under Order 22 Rule 3 of the CPC is allowed.
The legal representatives of appellant-Dharma Ram as
mentioned in para No.2 of the application are taken on record.
The Office objection No.2 is, thus, overrruled.
Call for the record of both the Courts below.
List the matter after three weeks.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J 18-neha/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!