Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11258 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1260/2014
Jodh Singh
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1209/2014
Jodh Singh
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Digvijay Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
Mr. Nishant Motsara
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/09/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mere calling
of witnesses would not prejudice the respondents and rather it
would clarify the situation of the compromise vis-a-vis the
guarantee mentioned at back of the cheque. Learned counsel
further submits that he is prepared to pay the cost.
Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the
respondent No.2 submit that there are two consecutive
judgments, which have refused such intervention.
(Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 09:16:35 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1260/2014]
This Court has carefully gone through the orders dated
15.02.2011 and 27.03.2014 whereby the learned courts below
have given sufficient reasons for not allowing the witnesses in
question at the belated stage.
In view of the above, no interference in the present petition
is called for and the same is accordingly dismissed. All pending
applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
76-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!