Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11152 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1046/2022
Sanwarlal S/o Gopal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Behind The
Sardar Patel School, Pooja Dairy Farm, K.k. Colony Basni,
District Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Girdhari Lal Soni S/o Late Mewaram Soni, R/o C-2Nd-42,
Kamla Nehru Nagar, Jodhpur, District Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shobha Prabhakar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP
Mr. Deen Dayal Purohit
Ms. Dimple Changani
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
07/09/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall file
an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for
condonation of delay in filing the petition during the course of day.
Permission is granted.
Thus, the delay in filing the petition is condoned.
Since a compromise has been arrived at between the parties,
thus, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the
matter has been finally heard.
It is stated at Bar that a compromise has been arrived at
between the parties after the judgment dated 22.10.2021 passed
by the appellate court, whereby the judgment dated 24.12.2019
passed by the trial has been affirmed.
(Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 08:51:56 PM)
(2 of 3) [CRLR-1046/2022]
It is borne out from the compromise that the complainant is
not inclined to proceed further in the matter.
Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a
decision of Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs
Sayed Babalal H [2010(5) SCC 66].
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant
respondent No.2 had accepted the sum towards full and final
settlement of the cheque, on the satisfaction of the complainant
and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view
of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.
Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the sentence awarded to the
petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is liable to be set
aside. However, as compromise has been arrived at after rejection
of the appeal preferred by the petitioner, a cost of 15% of the
cheque amount deserves to be imposed upon the petitioner in the
light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Apex court in the
case of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra).
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the
cheque amount with the Deputy Secretary, Rajasthan State Legal
Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of two weeks from
today.
The conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the
petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments
Act, vide judgment dated 24.12.2019 passed by learned Special
Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.2, Jodhpur
Metropolitan in Criminal Case No.88/2017 as affirmed by
judgment dated 22.10.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions
Judge No.5, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Appeal No.62/2020
(Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 08:51:56 PM)
(3 of 3) [CRLR-1046/2022]
(NCV No.62/2020), are hereby set aside on the basis of the
aforesaid compromise.
The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.
Stay petition also stands disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
196-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!