Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7547 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 820/2022
Shri Jagdish Prasad Education Trust, Village And Post Aangai,
Tehsil Sarmathura, District Dholpur Through Secretary Pramod
Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma,aged About 35
Years, R/o Village And Post Aangai, Tehsil Sarmathura, District
Dholpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Mr. Bhawani Singh Detha, I.A.S. Education Secretary,
Department Of Higher Education, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, I.A.S., Director, Elementary
Education, Bikaner.
3. Mr. Prof. Dinesh Prasad Saklani, Member
Secretary/chairperson, National Council For Teacher
Education, G-7 Sector-10 Dwarka New Delhi-110075.
4. Mr. Naveen Malik, Regional Director, Western Regional
Committee, National Council For Teacher Education, G-7
Sector-10 Dwarka New Delhi-110075.
5. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Education Secretary,
Department Of Higher Education, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
Order
30/11/2022
This petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against
the respondents in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7216/2021 dated
24/01/2022, a copy of the order is at page 16-A.
(2 of 2) [CCP-820/2022]
It is evident that the writ petition was disposed of in the light
of judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat,
Jodhpur in case of Surender Kaur Memorial College of Higher
Education vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No. 2359/2021).
There is no positive direction in the order at page 16-A which
was wilfully disobeyed by the respondents. The judgment of
Surender Kaur is not on the record nor the petitioner filed any
representation to the respondents-authorities annexing therewith
the judgment of Surender Kaur's case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
had sent a legal notice to the respondents before initiation of this
contempt petition.
The prayer is misconceived in absence of a case of wilful
disobedience. Consequently stands dismissed.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J
ANIL SHARMA /37
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!