Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manoj Kumar @ Monu vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 13875 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13875 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Manoj Kumar @ Monu vs State Of Rajasthan on 25 November, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 3)                   [SOSA-506/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                              No. 506/2022

Manoj Kumar @ Monu S/o Yashwant Sharma, Aged About 30
Years, R/o House No. 36, Street No. 1, Shiv Colony, S.s.b. Road,
Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar (Raj.) (At Present
Central Jail Ganganagar)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.      Maya Devi W/o Rajendra Kumar, R/o At Present Rented In
        The House Of Roshan Lal Nai Street No. 1 Shiv Colony
        S.s.b. Road Ps Jawahar Nagar Sri Ganganagar Raj.
                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :    Mr. DS Gharsana
For Respondent(s)         :    Mr. S.K. Mehar, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

25/11/2022

     Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record

of the case.

     Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant

has already undergone a custody period of about three years,

seven months and sixteen days.

     Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the

allegation of rape has not been proved by the prosecution before

the learned court below. It is also contended that medical

evidence also does not suggest any injury of sexual intercourse.

     Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the

appellant is not having any criminal antecedents. He further



                    (Downloaded on 26/11/2022 at 12:01:17 AM)
                                         (2 of 3)                   [SOSA-506/2022]


submits that the learned trial court has also discussed the fact

that the statement are over implicating.

     Learned    Public    Prosecutor        opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, the present Suspension of Sentence (Appeal)

Application filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 13.04.2022 in Session Case No.123/2021

(CIS NO.30/2019) against appellant- Manoj Kumar @ Monu S/o

Yashwant Sharma shall remain suspended till final disposal of

the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in a

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

Court on 04.01.2023 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall



                    (Downloaded on 26/11/2022 at 12:01:17 AM)
                                                                                (3 of 3)                [SOSA-506/2022]



                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.



                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

102-sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter