Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaitan Singh Bijarniya vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 13302 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13302 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Shaitan Singh Bijarniya vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 November, 2022
Bench: Arun Bhansali

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16660/2022

Shaitan Singh Bijarniya S/o Shri Dheermal Choudhary, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Dhani Shyamdas Wali, Village And Post Sirohi, Tehsil Neemkathana District Sikar (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Sirohi (Raj.)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar (Raj.)

5. Chief District Education Officer, Sirohi (Raj.)

6. Chief District Education Officer, Sikar (Raj.)

7. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Pindwara, District Sirohi (Raj.)

8. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Jhajharia (through VC) For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order

11/11/2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue

involved in the present writ petition is covered by the Coordinate

Bench decision dated 14.03.2019 rendered in the case of Ashok

Kumar Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SB Civil Writ Petition

No.15411/2018) and in the case of Dhanraj Meena vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors. (SB Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017), decided

on 15.01.2018.

(2 of 2) [CW-16660/2022]

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is also

allowed in terms of the judgments rendered in the case of Ashok

Kumar Sharma (supra) and Dhanraj Meena (supra) and it is

directed that the respondents while dealing with the case of the

petitioner pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the

provisions of Rules 24 & 26 of the RSR as per law.

The stay application is also disposed of.

The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner

would be entitled to the relief.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 62-Sumit/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter