Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2566 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16253/2021
Javed S/o Akhtar Hussain, R/o Haji Abdul Ki Dhani, Tan Began
Haidi, Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
(At Present Confined At Sub Jail Kishangarhbas)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman
For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP
Mr. Azad Ahmed
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
28/03/2022
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner Javed S/o Akhtar Hussain.
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR
No.225/2020 registered at Police Station Tijara, District Bhiwari
for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 149, 323, 447, 302, 148 of
the I.P.C.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case
has been foisted against the petitioner. He has nothing to do with
the alleged offence and no useful purpose would be served by
keeping him behind the bars.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for
the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioner that as many as nine accused
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16253/2021]
persons have been charge sheeted in this matter, out of which,
eight others have been released on bail by Coordinate Benches of
this Court. As per the allegations, the injury attributed to the
petitioner is through a sharp edged weapon. The autopsy report,
conducted by the medical officer reveals that two abrasions on the
lower leg of the deceased, this injury can be caused by a weapon
of blunt object. The injury No.2 is the stitched lacerated wound of
size of 7 CM with irregular intervening margins. The Medical
jurisprudence suggests that if a sharped aged weapon is used the
margins of the wound would be regular and clear cut. At the stage
of bail, this Court refrains itself from making any observation, as
the same may affect either of the party, however, placing reliance
on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hallu
and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in 1974
SCR (3) 652. Considering the arguments advanced by the
counsel for the parties and the fact that all other co-accused
persons were released on bail, this court deems it just and proper
to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, named
above, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-
each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their
appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing
as and when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
RAJAT KUMAR/19
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!