Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1959 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15039/2017
Rajeev Behl And Ors.
----Petitioners
Versus
The Instrumentaion Ltd And Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Saugath Roy For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Maloo, Senior Adv. with Mr. Vishnu Bohra Mr. Sanju Saini on behalf of Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
04/03/2022
During the course of arguments it was reflected that the Kota
unit of respondent No.1 is under closure and the company is
declared sick and perhaps some order is passed by Board of
Industrial and Financial Reconstruction or any other Competent
Authority. It was also contended that in the light of Circular
No.44/12/07, the CVC has issued guidelines that in case of
disciplinary proceedings, no retiral/pensionary benefits are to be
released.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by the
Coordinate Bench judgments it has been held that the respondent
No.1 has its own set of Rules and as per it, the retiral benefits
have been released to some of the co-accused in the FIR.
In the instant matter, this Court requests learned senior
counsel Mr. N.K. Maloo to appraise the Court about status of
respondent No.1, whether any operating agency has been
(2 of 2) [CW-15039/2017]
appointed, whether permission of BIFR/NCLT or any other
Competent Authority is required for releasing of the amount or if
their impleadment is necessary.
List the matter on 23.03.2022.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Arun/Manish Prajapati/1
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!