Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anuradha Kumari vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 8319 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8319 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Anuradha Kumari vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 June, 2022
Bench: Vinod Kumar Bharwani

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3730/2022

1. Anuradha Kumari W/o Sh. Mukesh Kumar, D/o Sh.

Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 25 Years, Asind Teh. Asind, Dist. Bhilwara, Raj.

2. Mukesh Kumr S/o Sh. Kanwar Pal, Aged About 31 Years, Asind Teh. Asind, Dist. Bhilwara, Raj.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Dept. Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara, Raj.

3. The Superintendent Of Police, Rajsamand, Raj.

4. The Sho, P.s. Asind, Dist. Bhilwara, Raj.

5. The Sho, P.s. Bheem, Dist. Rajsamand, Raj.

6. Bhanwar Lal S/o Sh. Lala Ram, Barar, Dist. Rajsamand, Raj. (Father).

7. Avinash S/o Sh. Bhanwar Lal, R/o Barar Dist. Rajsamand, Raj. (Brother).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

27/06/2022

The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction for being

provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3730/2022]

threat to their lives at the hands of respondent No.6, who is father

of petitioner No.1. The petitioners allegedly approached the

Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara with a prayer to be provided

with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their

request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners

and the marriage ceremony performed between them have been

filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State

of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by

the petitioners for directing the S.P., Bhilwara to provide protection

to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara shall have the

matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection

shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The

S.P. Bhilwara shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

It is hereby clarified that this order may not be

construed to be a validation of petitioners' marriage and proof of

their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any

criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at

the instance of their relatives.

The misc. petition as well as stay petition accordingly

stand disposed of.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J 79-Mamta/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter