Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4235 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 6376/2022
Mosin Khan S/o Nisar Mohammad, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Movatitola, Kagadi Devra, District Bundi ( Accused Petitioner
Confined In Bundi Jail)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kumud Singh
Mr. Mohd. Haris
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
27/06/2022 This bail application has been filed under Section 439 of
Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 191/2021 registered at Police
Station Kotwali, District Bundi, for the offence under Section 363,
366-A, 376-DA of IPC and Sections 5/6 & 16/17 of POCSO Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
petitioner is behind the bars since 01.10.2021 and charge-sheet
has been filed. The prosecutrix had gone with petitioner with her
own free will and no case is made out against him. Statement of
the prosecutrix and her mother has been recorded before the
learned Trial Court and it shows that age of the prosecutrix is
about 21 years. Hence, the accused-petitioner may be released on
bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the second bail
application.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-6376/2022]
During the course of argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner has placed reliance upon the Hon'ble Bombay High
Court bail order dated 09.01.2020, passed in CRLMB No.
2632/2019 'Anirudha Radheyshyam Yadav v/s The State of
Maharashtra'.
Heard and perused the material and judgment relied upon on
record.
The first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed vide
order dated 11.02.2022 after filing of charge-sheet with liberty to
file afresh after recording the statement of the prosecutrix. As per
that order, the prosecutrix is 16 years of age and as per her school
certificate, her date of birth is 09.10.2005 and she is minor.
During the course of trial, statements of the prosecutrix and her
mother have been recorded as PW-2 and PW-1 and both are not
hostile witnesses.
Therefore, looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the
case and gravity of the offence, but without expressing any
opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it not proper to
enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 439 of
Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
PAYAL/5
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!