Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Shuchi Mathur W/O Dr. Apar ... vs The Union Of India
2022 Latest Caselaw 4225 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4225 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Dr. Shuchi Mathur W/O Dr. Apar ... vs The Union Of India on 22 June, 2022
Bench: Anoop Kumar Dhand
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8928/2022

Dr. Shuchi Mathur W/o Dr. Apar Mathur
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
The Union Of India & Ors.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shah, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sarah Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Harendra Neil, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for Mr. R. D. Rastogi, ASG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND ( V.J.)

Order

22/06/2022

Matter comes up on the stay application.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has participated in National Eligibility Entrance Test Super

Specialty, 2021 and she applied for super specialty course in

Cardiac Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine. Learned counsel

submits that out of 400 marks, the petitioner secured 256 marks

and on the basis of her merit, she was given admission in Cardiac

Anesthesia. Learned counsel submits that so far as Super

Specialty course regarding her admission in Critical Care Medicine

is concerned, initially, the petitioner secured 191 marks out of 400

marks and at the relevant time cut-off marks for this subject i.e.

Critical Care Medicine is 193, hence, petitioner was not eligible to

get admission in the said Super Specialty course i.e. Critical Care

Medicine. Learned counsel submits that subsequently when the

students were not available with the respondents, a revised

(2 of 4) [CW-8928/2022]

qualifying criteria was issued on 16.06.2022 and cut-off marks for

admission in Critical Care Medicine were reduced from 193 to 179

marks. He further submits that now the petitioner has become

eligible to get admission in Critical Care Medicine on the basis of

her marks i.e. 191 while cut-off marks in getting admission in the

subject is 179 only. Counsel submits that vide order dated

17.06.2022, respondents have treated the petitioner as ineligible

by saying that any candidate who had joined the seat in the

earlier round of AIQ or counseling conducted by State of

Tamilnadu (in-service seats), shall not be eligible for participating

in the Special Mop-Up Round. Learned counsel submits that this

condition is under challenge in this petition because this condition

is violating the fundamental rights of the petitioner contained

under Article 14 of the Constitution of India as less meritorious

candidates are given admission while the petitioner secured more

marks i.e. 191. Lastly, learned counsel submits that in the

peculiar circumstances interim order may kindly be passed

directing the respondents to allow the petitioner in Special Mop-Up

Round counseling for Super Specialty Course of Critical Care

Medicine in pursuance to National Eligibility Entrance Test Super

Specialty, 2021.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposed

arguments raised by learned counsel for the petitioner and

submits that in view of Clause-B of the impugned notice dated

17.06.2022, the petitioner is not eligible to participate in the Mop-

Up Round counseling as she has already been given admission in

Cardiac Anesthesia. Learned counsel further submits that the

petitioner is not eligible to participate in Mop-Up Round Counseling

in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

(3 of 4) [CW-8928/2022]

Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust and Ors. Vs. Medical Council of

India and Ors. in Civil Writ Petition No. 267/2017, he has brought

attention of this court in para No.s 3 and 4 of the judgment of

Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust and Ors (supra), which reads

thus:-

"3. As per the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Ashish Ranjan Vs. Union of India & Ors. [(2016) 11 SCC 225], conducted by the DGHS/State Government or authority designated by the State Government for All India Quota (including Deemed University) and State Quota seats respectively.

4. After the second round of conselling for All India Quota seats, the students who take admission in All India Quota seats should not be allowed/permitted to vacate the seats. This would ensure that very few seats are reverted to the State Quota and also All India Quota seats are filed by students from the all India merit list only. The students who take admission and secure admission in Deemed Universities pursuant to the second round of counselling conducted by the DGHS shall not be eligible to participate in any other counselling."

Learned counsel submits that since admission has already

been given to the petitioner in Cardiac Anesthesia and there is no

provision of submitting any resignation, hence, petitioner is not

eligible to participate in the Mop-Up Round counseling.

Heard and considered the arguments of both the sides.

It is a peculiar case where petitioner has been deprived to

get admission in Critical Care Medicine inspite of securing much

higher marks than the cut-off marks. The cut-off marks in getting

admission in Critical Care Medicine is 179 only while the petitioner

has secured 191 marks. For no fault of the petitioner, she has

been deprived to participate in Mop-Up Round Counseling. Thus,

the matter requires consideration.

(4 of 4) [CW-8928/2022]

The respondents are directed to allow the petitioner in mop-

up round counseling for her admission in the subject Critical Care

Medicine on provisional basis.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the last date

of time for participation in the mop-up round counseling is

22.06.2022 at 12.00 PM and now the order has been passed at

12.00 PM so under these circumstances, petitioner be permitted to

submit her option/application for her participation in Mop-Up

Round Counseling through offline process.

In view of submissions made, the petitioner is allowed to do

so and the respondents are directed to permit the petitioner on

offline basis.

Interim order passed by this Court today, shall be subject to

final outcome of this petition, petitioner would not claim any

equity on the basis of the interim order passed by this Court.

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND), V.J.

Pooja /93

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter