Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4174 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 87/2001
1. Smt. Nana w/o Kailash Chandra, aged about 19 years.
2. Manoj S/o Lt. Sh. Kailash Chandra, aged 6 months, minor
through mother and natural guardian Smt. Nana
3. Sh. Kalyan Sahai s/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 40 years (Died)
4. Smt. Kamla Devi w/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 35 years.
5. Choti w/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 55 years (died)
6. Kalu Ram s/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 13 years.
7. Mahadev son of Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 10 years.
8 Ku. Indra d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 14 years.
9. Radha d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 8 years.
All resident of Keria-ka-bas, (Bagru Tehsil Sanganer, District
Jaipur)
----claimants/Appellants
Versus
1. Tejendra Pal Singh son of Sh. Gurjit Singh, resident of
Chandrabhushanpura, Tehsil Dhanesar, District Kucheter (KKP),
Kurukshetra, Haryana.
2. The New India Assurance Company Limited, Regional Office,
Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
----Respondent/defendants
Connected With S.B. Cross Objection (Civil) No. 44/2001
1. Smt. Nana w/o Kailash Chandra, aged about 19 years.
2. Manoj S/o Lt. Sh. Kailash Chandra, aged 6 months, minor through mother and natural guardian Smt. Nana
3. Sh. Kalyan Sahai s/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 40 years (Died)
4. Smt. Kamla Devi w/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 35 years.
5. Choti w/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged 55 years (died)
6. Kalu Ram s/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 13 years.
7. Mahadev son of Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 10 years. 8 Ku. Indra d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 14 years.
9. Radha d/o Sh. Kalyan Sahai, aged 8 years. All resident of Keria-ka-bas, (Bagru Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur)
----Claimants/Appellants Versus
(2 of 3) [CMA-87/2001]
1. Jagtar Singh son of Karnail Singh resident of H. No.270, Shastri Colony, Karnal, PS Karnal Haryana.
2. Tejendra Pal Singh son of Sh. Gurjit Singh, resident of Chandrabhushanpura, Tehsil Dhanesar, District Kucheter (KKP), Kurukshetra, Haryana.
2. The New India Assurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
----Defendant/Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rathore-Insurance Company
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
01/06/2022
An oral request/prayer has been made by the counsel
appearing for the respondent No.2-Insurance Company that
the words "Insurance Company" in the second and third lines
on the top of page No.7 in the Judgment dated 26.05.2022
passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.87/2001 be
ordered to be corrected as the aforesaid words have been
typed due to typographical error.
Further prayer has been made by the counsel that the
words "Insurance Company" in line Nos.2 and 3 on the top of
page No.7 of the judgment dated 26.05.2022 in the
aforementioned appeal be ordered to be read as "respondent
No.1" and the typographical error in the aforesaid judgment
may kindly be corrected to the aforesaid extent.
(3 of 3) [CMA-87/2001]
Prayer when read with the aforesaid judgment appears
to be innocuous. Therefore, the aforesaid typographical error
is corrected in the aforesaid judgment in 'red ink' and
necessary corrections are also made in the web copy of the
aforesaid judgment.
The order passed today shall be treated as part and
parcel of the judgment dated 26.05.2022 passed by this
Court.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Sharma NK/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!