Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thakra Ram vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 8946 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8946 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Thakra Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 July, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                       (1 of 3)                    [CRLAS-828/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 828/2022

1.     Thakra Ram S/o Poora Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
       Deora Jhab Ps Dist. Jalore (Confined In Dist. Jail Jalore)
2.     Narana Ram S/o Mala Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
       Deora Jhab Ps Dist. Jalore (Confined In Dist. Jail Jalore)
3.     Rama Ram S/o Mala Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
       Deora Jhab Ps Dist. Jalore (Confined In Dist. Jail Jalore)
                                                                   ----Appellants
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan.
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Teja Ram
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Abhishek Purohit, Addl.G.A.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

08/07/2022
     Admit.

     Since the learned Public Prosecutor already appearing on

behalf of respondent-State, accepts notice on behalf of the

respondent No.1-State.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.509/2022.

     Learned   counsel       for    the      appellants         submits   that   a

compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Learned

counsel further submits that the crucial witnesses became hostile

and weapon in question i.e. axe was not recovered.

     Learned   Public    Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension     of

sentence application, but fairly submits that the compromise to


                    (Downloaded on 11/07/2022 at 08:52:12 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                 [CRLAS-828/2022]


the extent of Section 323 IPC was accepted by the learned trial

court.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellants.

     Accordingly,     S.B.     Suspension            of    Sentence    (Appeal)

No.509/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 31.05.2022 in Sessions Case No.13/2020

(155/11) against appellants (1) Thakra Ram S/o Poora Ram,

(2) Narana Ram S/o Mala Ram and (3) Rama Ram S/o Mala

Ram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid

appeal, provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this

Court on 10.08.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That they will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellants changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing their changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the

                      (Downloaded on 11/07/2022 at 08:52:12 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-828/2022]


                                   accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

                                   shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused appellants do not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

4-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter