Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4971 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 320/2022
Smt. Gopi Devi W/o Late Shri Balulal Gurjar
----Petitioner
Versus
Shri Abhay Ku. Singh & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Bandhu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Maharshi, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA
Order
20/07/2022
Matter comes up on an application for taking
documents on record.
Application is allowed for the reasons mentioned
therein and the document annexed with the application is taken
on record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
that the order dated dated 24.8.2021 has not been complied with.
In the light of the orders passed in the case of Smt. Narayani Devi
W/o late Shri Prahlad Gurjar and Mst. Papu Devi Versus The State
of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3087/1996), the
petitioner is entitled to get the special pensionary award.
On the other hand, learned AAG appearing for the
respondents submits that in compliance of the order dated
24.8.2021, the petitioner's representation has already been
decided vide order dated 4.5.2022.
Heard. Considered.
(2 of 2) [CCP-320/2022]
From the material on record, it is noticed that this
Court vide order dated 24.8.2021 disposed of the writ petition
giving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation within
two weeks from that date and the appropriate authority was
directed to consider and decide the same within two moths
thereafter. The petitioner was also granted liberty to place reliance
on any judgment, which he may provide to the authorities and the
same was also directed to be considered in accordance with law.
Pursuant to the order dated 24.8.2021, the petitioner submitted
representation to the authority concerned for granting special
pensionary award and relied on the judgments passed by this
Court in the case of Smt. Narayani Devi W/o late Shri Prahlad
Gurjar and Mst. Papu Devi Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.
(S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3087/1996), but while deciding the
petitioner's representation vide order dated 4.5.2022, aforesaid
two judgments have not been considered.
In view of the above, let the order dated 24.8.2021 be
complied with within two weeks from today, failing which
contemnor-respondent no.2 shall remain present in person in the
the Court on the next date of hearing.
List again on 22.8.2022.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
DK/84
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!