Rajasthan High Court
Banshi Lal Bhadhala S/O Shishu Pal ... vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board on 19 July, 2022
Bench: Inderjeet Singh
[HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2083/2022
1. Banshi Lal Bhadhala S/o Shishu Pal Singh Bhadhala, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o Village Ganeshpura, Post Dookiya,
Village Palsana, District, Sikar, Rajasthan.
2. Jeetendra Jatav S/o Ramesh Chand Jatav, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Post Bhukrawali, Tehsil Hindaun City,
District Karauli, Rajasthan.
3. Baraj Mohan Bairwa S/o Gopal Bairwa, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village Chikana Post Dangarthal, Tehsil Niwai,
District, Tonk, Rajasthan.
4. Bhinya Ram Dukiya S/o Bhanwara Ram Dukiya, Aged
About 23 Years, R/o Village Post Odint, Tehsil Ladnun,
District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
5. Balram Gurjar S/o Kedar Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Village Goliya, Post Brahman Bairada, Tehsil
Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
6. Abhishek Dhamu S/o Satya Dev Singh, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village Post Utradabas, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan.
7. Bablu Singh S/o Ghisu Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Village Post Dhingi Tehsil Taranagar, District, Churu,
Rajasthan.
8. Akram Khan S/o Hanim Mohammad, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Post Ajeetpura, Ward No. 11, Tehsil
Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
9. Bablu Mundel S/o Ramniwas Mundel, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Village Post Khinyala, Tehsil Jayal, District
Nagaur, Rajasthan.
10. Arvind Sharma S/o Babu Lal Sharma, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Near Keshav Mandir, Suratpur, District Dausa,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
(Downloaded on 25/07/2022 at 09:26:52 PM)
(2 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Connected with
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2258/2022
1. Ram Singh Phagna Son Of Shri Udairam Gurjar, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Awaniya
Via Bagru, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Sudarshan Sharma Son Of Shri Hari Prasad Sharma,
Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of New Bagra Colony,
Didwana Road, Kuchamancity, District Nagaur (Raj.)
3. Vinod Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Panna Lal Yadav, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of 4/237, Swami Vivekanand
Nagar, Kota (Raj.)
4. Shahrukh Khan Son Of Shri Zafar Ali, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 14, Near Goriyan Masjid,
Bisau, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
5. Sunil Kumar Son Of Shri Prahalad, Aged About 21 Years,
Resident Of Village Gadiya, Post Gadiya, Tehsil
Ramganjmandi, District Kota (Raj.)
6. Rakesh Meena Son Of Shri Sahab Lal Meena, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Chamawali, Post
Utarana, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi (Raj.)
7. Subash Chander Dhaka Son Of Shri Nemi Chand Dhaka,
Aged About 32 Years, Resident Infront Of Railway
Station, Ward No. 33, Near Ravi Public School, Fathepur
Shekhawati, Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
(3 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2349/2022
1. Shivam Sharma S/o Sunil Kumar Sharma, Aged About
23 Years, R/o 100, Shrirampura Colony, Boytawala
Benwar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Sharad Kumar Borakh S/o Bahadur Ram Jat, Aged
About 22 Years, R/o Dhani Bendpura, Post Dehara Jodi,
Post Guhala, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
3. Ramniwas Prajapat S/o Khayali Ram, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Vpo Billyon Bass Rampura, Tehsil Sardar
Shahar, District Churu, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3793/2022
1. Raju Ram S/o Prema Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Village Guda Vishnoiyan, Tehsil Luni, Jodhpur, District
Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Vishnu S/o Surja Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Guda Vishnoiyan, Tehsil Luni, Jodhpur,
District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
3. Ramlal S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Siyako Ki Dhani, Village Kanawas, Kapana, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
4. Rakesh S/o Babulal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nadi
Wali Dhaniya, Fitkasani, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
(4 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3198/2022
1. Amit Kumar S/o Sunil Kumar, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Vpo Pathena, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
2. Banshi Lal Meghwal S/o Lala Ram, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Vpo Sewa, Tehsil Deedwana, District
Nagaur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3411/2022
Shubham Kumar Sharma Son Of Shankar Lal Sharma, Aged
About 21 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 04, Khatushyamji,
Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3478/2022
(5 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
1. Rabin Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Suresh Kumar
Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village And
Post Jheru Via Pilani, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2. Rajkumar Son Of Shri Sanwar Mal, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of Gurjaron Ki Dhani, Balaran, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3709/2022
1. Rohit Gurjar Son Of Shri Radha Kishan, Aged About 23
Years, Resident Of Village Banskhera, Post Deory Jodh,
Tehsil Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.)
2. Vipin Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Dhani Bainada,
Village Hameerpur, Post Samra, Tehsil Thanagaji,
District Alwar (Raj.)
3. Ram Charan Meena Son Of Shri Khanahaya Lal Meena,
Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Motiwali Dhani, Near
Railway Station, District Dausa (Raj.)
4. Ramnarayan Meena Son Of Shri Arjun Lal Meena, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Dungarpur, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa
(Raj.)
5. Sanjay Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Fateh Singh Meena,
Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of D-56, Gayatri Nagar,
Dausa (Raj.)
6. Satayveer Son Of Shri Mohar Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Hanutpura, Post Lalpur,
Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
(6 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
7. Vikash Kumar Jangir Son Of Shri Om Prakash Jangid,
Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Deenwa
Jatan, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
8. Yadram Jat Son Of Shri Gopal Lal Jat, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Village Keriya, Post Ganwar, Tehsil
Malpura, District Tonk (Raj.)
9. Satyaveer Singh Son Of Shri Hoshiyar Singh, Aged
About 40 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Ghardana
Khurd, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
10. Sandeep Kumar Son Of Shri Jai Singh, Aged About 22
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Janana, Tehsil
Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
11. Vikas Meena Son Of Shri Om Prakash Meena, Aged
About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Ramjipura, Post
Khariyawas, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
12. Sheetal Kumar Son Of Shri Mauhar Singh, Aged About
23 Years, Resident Of Village Motiramka Nagla,
Piprauwa, Rajahtha, District Dholpur (Raj.)
13. Satish Kumar Son Of Shri Ramawtar, Aged About 38
Years, Resident Of Village Indersar, Post Pacheri Badi,
District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3923/2022
1. Suresh Kumar Son Of Shri Jagan Singh, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village Bhuma Chhota, Post Bhuma
Bara, Teshil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
2. Tara Chand Ruhela Son Of Shri Jeeta Ram Ruhela,
Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
(7 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Bairas, Teshil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
3. Vimlesh Palawat Son Of Shri Ashok Singh Palawat,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Dhani Charan, Birmi,
District Jhunjhunu (Raj.), At Present Resident Of D-17,
Choudhary Colony, Road No. 14, V.k.i.a., Sikar Road,
Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Vijay Singh Son Of Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Mardatu Chhoti, Post
Karanga Bada, Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3964/2022
1. Rajesh Son Of Hira Ram Saharan, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Bherusary, District
Hanumangarh (Raj.)
2. Vishram Kumar Balai Son Of Shri Ramkishor Balai,
Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Tilwar, Tehsil
Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
3. Sohan Lal Bairwa Son Of Shri Cheetar Lal Bairwwa,
Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Manrajpura,
Post Pancholash, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
4. Rakesh Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Prem Singh Gurjar,
Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Lakhanpur,
Post Naharkhora, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
5. Rajaram Ujjwal Son Of Shri Babu Lal Ujjwal, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Raigron Ka Mohalla,
Village And Post Kalmanda, Tehsil Malpura, District
Tonk (Raj.)
6. Vikas Kumar Son Of Shri Rajender Singh, Aged About
(8 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
26 Years, Resident Of Village Ghotra Patra, Post Kunji,
Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
7. Ummed Singh Son Of Shri Shaitan Singh, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Indira Colony Siwera At Post
Siwera, Pindwara, District Sirohi (Raj.)
8. Ved Prakash Mahawar Son Of Shri Murari Lal Mahawar,
Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Hanuman Mandir Ke
Paas, Mandawara Road, Patel Nagar, Hindaun City,
District Karauli (Raj.)
9. Vimal Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Satya Narayan Gurjar,
Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Deorawas, Tehsil Dooni, District Tonk (Raj.)
10. Sawai Singh Bhati Son Of Shri Bhanwar Singh Bhati,
Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of B-209, Karni Nagar,
Lalgarh, Bikaner (Raj.)
11. Yogesh Singh Rajpoot Son Of Shri Mahendra Singh
Rajpoot, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village
Baskarnawat, Post Neemuchena, Tehsil Bansoor,
District Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4218/2022
Radheshyam Vairagi S/o Gopal Das Vairagi, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Post And Tehsil Gogunda,
District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
(9 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4406/2022
Rakesh Kumar Chaneja S/o Prabhati Lal Chaneja, Aged About
27 Years, R/o H.no. 51, Khurdi, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4410/2022
Ankit Sharma S/o Babu Lal Sharma, Aged About 22 Years,
R/o Vpo Kharwaraniji, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur
Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4496/2022
1. Suresh Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Prahlad Gurjar, Aged
About 22 Years, Resident Of Hanumanpura, Post
Dooni, District Tonk (Raj.)
2. Sunil Kumar Son Of Shri Balveer, Aged About 23 Years,
(10 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Resident Of Village And Post Bhompura, 16Ag, District
Hanumangarh (Raj.)
3. Rinku Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Meghraj Meena, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Meena Baroda,
Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
4. Vinod Kumar Son Of Shri Shish Pal, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Rampura, Post Kunji, Tehsil
Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
5. Vikas Meena Son Of Shri B.l. Meena, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of B-8, Ram Colony, Kati Ghati,
Rajgarh Road, Alwar (Raj.)
6. Sahdev Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Ranveer Singh
Rathore, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of E-90,
Agrasen Nagar, Churu (Raj.)
7. Saurabh Patidar Son Of Shri Pavan Patidar, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Madalda, Tehsil
Garhi, District Banswara (Raj.)
8. Rahul Meena Son Of Shri Prahlad Meena, Aged About
22 Years, Resident Of 35, Shivesh Vihar, Near Balajai
City, Bindayaka, Jaipur (Raj.)
9. Sumraj Singh Gurjar Son Of Shri Amar Singh Gurjar,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Parmalla Ka
Pura, Jatwara, Tehsil Suroth, District Karauli (Raj.)
10. Roshan Jangid Son Of Shri Nand Kishor Jangid, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Ebra, Post Raithal,
District Bundi (Raj.)
11. Ravindra Yadav Son Of Shri Om Prakash Yadav, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Shanpo Ki Dhani,
Doongarsi Ka Bas, Post Karansar, Tehsil Kishangarh
Rainwal, District Jaipur (Raj.)
12. Tarun Sharma Son Of Shri Vidhyadhar Sharma, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 13, Anand Nagar,
Mungaska, Delhi Road, Near Amarnath Petrol Pump,
District Alwar (Raj.)
13. Chandan Kumar Chhangani Son Of Shri Kishan Lal
Chhangani, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Near
Pariyon Ki Haweli, Ward No. 05, Khairthal, District
Alwar (Raj.)
14. Subhash Jangid Son Of Shri Lal Chand Jangid, Aged
(11 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
About 25 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 4, Vrindavan
Vihar Vistar, Near Anokha Gaon Hotel, Sikar Road,
Harmara, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4615/2022
1. Ravi Mewada Son Of Shri Brajraj, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Gothiyana, Tehsil
Arain, District Ajmer (Raj.)
2. Indrajeet Singh Shaktawat Son Of Shri Rajendra Singh
Shaktawat, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ravala
Street, Ravala Colony, District Udaipur (Raj.)
3. Shobaram Gurjar Son Of Shri Kaluram Gurjar, Aged
About 33 Years, Resident Of Village Jethalya, Post
Khareda, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.)
4. Rajesh Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Pappu Ram Meena,
Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Korda Kalan,
Post Gumanpura, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Department
of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
(12 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4616/2022
1. Yogesh Kumar Bairwa Son Of Shri Harinarayan Bairwa,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Kunjbihaiupura, Post
Mandor, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Subhash Gurjar Son Of Shri Ram Chandra Gurjar, Aged
About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Thikriya,
Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.)
3. Ramesh Chandra Patidar Son Of Shri Mavji Patidar,
Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Decha, Tehsil
Sagwara, District Dungarpur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4658/2022
Buddhi Prakash Gurjar S/o Lala Ram Gurjar, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Village Rajpura, Post Lallai, Tehsil Sarwar, District
Ajmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4820/2022
1. Yogendra Kumar Nagar Son Of Shri Bhavar Lal Nagar,
(13 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Khanpuriya, Post
Saktpur, Tehsil Atru, District Baran (Raj.)
2. Rajdeep Singh Chouhan Son Of Shri Khangar Singh
Chouhan, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of K-31,
Dwarika Nagar, Housing Board, Dhoinda, District
Rajsamand (Raj.)
3. Sanjay Kumar Saini Son Of Shri Suraj Mal Saini, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Dhani Jalpali, Village And
Post Mundru, Tehsil Sri Madhopur, District Sikar (Raj.)
4. Girish Mahawar Son Of Shri Subhash Chandra Gupta,
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Kamla Colony, Near
Gayatri Mandir, Ward No. 11, Khairthal, Alwar (Raj.)
5. Satyawan Singh Gurjar Son Of Shri Lalalu Ram Gurjar,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Kherlavas, Post
Hansmahal, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Ravi Bhan Singh Rajawat Son Of Shri Chandra Bhan
Singh Rajawat, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of
Village And Post Rajaji Ka Garh, Tehsil Todabhim,
District Karauli (Raj.)
7. Radhe Shyam Meena Son Of Shri Ramkaran Meena,
Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Nai Kothi Ki Dhani,
Village Badi Ka Bass, Post Beelwa, District Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Rahul Pareek Son Of Shri Satya Narayan Pareek, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of 1-M-9, Talwandi, Kota
(Raj.)
9. Rakesh Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Mangal Ram Yadav,
Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Bichpuri, Post
Bejwar Naruka, Tehsil Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.)
10. Ramsingh Bairwa Son Of Shri Nand Lal Bairwa, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Bairwa Dhani, Post
Golakabas, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
11. Satendra Singh Son Of Shri Laxmi Narayan, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nahila,
Tehsil Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.)
12. Shree Ram Son Of Shri Nathu Ram, Aged About 21
Years, Resident Of Bhambhuo Ki Dhai, Nokhara,
Bhatiyan Bap, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
13. Sudama Sharma Son Of Shri Ratan Lal, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Pehal, Tehsil
(14 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.)
14. Surendra Kumar Son Of Shri Chandra Ram, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Ranasar, Post
Rasal, Tehsil Kuchamancity, District Nagaur (Raj.)
15. Vikash Kumar Khandal Son Of Shri Hanuman Datt
Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of 117/479,
Agrawal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.)
16. Vinit Kumawat Son Of Shri Shivji Ram Kumawat, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Bihari Pole Ke Bahar, New
City Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.)
17. Vinod Kumar Gocher Son Of Shri Hemraj Gochar, Aged
About 29 Years, Resident Of 15, Gurjaron Ka Mohalla,
Kishanpura Richhanda, District Baran (Raj.)
18. Vishal Patidar Son Of Shri Ram Prasad, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Patidar Dharmshala Ke Samne, Dag
Road, Guradiya Joga, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
19. Sujal Gautam Son Of Shri Satyanarain Sharma, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of A-963, Gate No. 07,
Navjivansingh Colony, Bundi (Raj.)
20. Vinod Kumar Patidar Son Of Shri Kailash Chandra
Patidar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village And
Post Haroniya, Tehsil Pirawa, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
21. Rameshwar Prasad Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena,
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Fatehpur, Tehsil
Digod, District Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4874/2022
Ankit Kumar S/o Prabhu Ram Jat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
(15 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Jato Ka Mohalla, Village Bhairwai Khajpura, Post Paner, Tehsil
Roopangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its
Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5018/2022
1. Vishnu Kumar Sharma S/o Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged
About 21 Years, R/o Village Tilpatti, Post Rajpura,
Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Suresh S/o Kisana Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Palli
2 Lohawat, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5060/2022
1. Suresh Mahariya S/o Bhoma Ram Mahariya, Aged About
39 Years, R/o Vpo Harsinghwali Dhani, Tehsil Khandela,
District Sikar, Rajasthan.
2. Rakesh S/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Vpo Maligaon, Via Bagar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
3. Vivek Bhambu S/o Jagdish Chandra, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Village Dheerasar, Post Gangiyasar, Tehsil
Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
4. Rohit Garwa S/o Jage Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o
(16 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Vpo Maligaon, Via Bagar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5179/2022
1. Rajesh Royal Son Of Shri Harish Chandra, Aged About
42 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kulhariyo Ki
Dhani Via Bissau, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2. Vishnu Singh Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 23
Years, Resident Of Village Banka Kheda, Post Rindliya
Rampura, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.)
3. Vinod Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Chak 10, Sdp, Lalgarh, Jattan, Tehsil
Sardulshahar, District Sri Gangangar (Raj.)
4. Sanjay Lohar Son Of Shri Mangi Lal Lohar, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Near Bus Stand, Jhadol, Udaipur
(Raj.)
5. Sunil Kumar Son Of Shri Diwan Singh, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Hamirwas Bada, District Churu (Raj.)
6. Sachin Achara Son Of Shri Devi Singh Achara, Aged
About 32 Years, Resident Of 570, Bank Ya Wali Johadi
Katrathal, Village And Post Katrathal, District Sikar
(Raj.)
7. Satish Kumar Tailor Son Of Shri Daya Lal Tailor, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Bassi Ada,
Tehsil Ganoda, District Banswara (Raj.)
8. Uatam Singh Son Of Shri Rai Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Dalman, Post Mehari, Sardar
Shahar, District Churu (Raj.)
9. Ramdhan Sharma Son Of Shri Bhagwana Ram Sharma,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Ramsisar
Bhedwaliya, Sardar Shahar, District Churu (Raj.)
(17 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
10. Shree Ram Meel Son Of Shri Dhanna Ram Meel, Aged
About 33 Years, Resident Of Village Udaipura, Post
Mohanpura, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
11. Vishnu Saini Son Of Shri Murari Lal, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Dhani Bori Kothi, Village And Post
Harsora, Tehsil Bansoor, District Alwar (Raj.)
12. Rajendra Kumar Son Of Shri Chimna Ram, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of Village Ribiya, Post Khandwa,
District Churu (Raj.)
13. Ridhkaran Singh Charan Son Of Shri Loondan Charan,
Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Madarna Colony,
Behind Krishi Mandi, Mandor Road, Jodhpur (Raj.)
14. Suresh Kumar Boss Son Of Shri Deepa Ram, Aged About
29 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Itendra Charnan
Via Rani, District Pali (Raj.)
15. Sashi Dutt Son Of Shri Som Dutt Arya, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of D-325-C, Jagdamba Nagar,
Heerapura Power House, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
16. Suresh Kumar Son Of Shri Hajari Ram, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Salariya, Tehsil,
Rani, District Pali (Raj.)
17. Vikash Son Of Shri Mani Ram, Aged About 26 Years,
Resident Of Village Amarpura, Post Bhuwari, Tehsil
Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.)
18. Ramuram Son Of Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 21 Years,
Resident Of Shivpuri, Village And Post Katar Chhoti,
Tehsil Bhidasar, District Churu (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
(18 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5376/2022
1. Vijay Sain Son Of Shri Vinod Kumar Sain, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of G-39, 64 Khamba, Mirdard Marg,
New Delhi, Permanent Address- 214, New Colony,
Chanwara, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2. Ruga Ram Son Of Shri Deva Ram, Aged About 24 Years,
Resident Of Village And Post Koloo, Tehsil Baytu, District
Barmer (Raj.)
3. Raja Ram Meena Son Of Shri Jagdish Meena, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Kheda, Post Khedi,
Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5733/2022
1. Akshay Kumar Meena S/o Banwari Lal Meena, Aged
About 25 Years, R/o Meena Colony, Near Krishi Upaj
Mandi, Nayabas Road, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar,
Rajasthan.
2. Khaim Chand Sharma S/o Sukhanand Sharma, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Gayatri Colony, Nagar, Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
3. Deepika Meena D/o Lakhan Singh Meena, Aged About
26 Years, R/o Plot No. 95, Vipra Vihar Colony, Sawai
Getor, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Alok Sharma S/o Jagdish Sharma, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Village Goner, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
5. Amit Poswal S/o Jagpal Singh Poswal, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village Narayanpura, Post Post Jagir Bandikui,
(19 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6165/2022
1. Balram Godara S/o Mota Ram Godara, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Ram Dev Ji Mandir Ke Pass, Ward No. 14,
Barsingar, District Bikaner, Rajasthan (Roll No.
3294073).
2. Pradeep Kumar S/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Vpo Sikandra, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 3042723).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6874/2022
Shankar Lal Meena Son Of Shri Chhotu Ram Meena, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Village God Ka Bas, Ram Nagar,
Kotkhawda, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
(20 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
2. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7635/2022
1. Rekha Ram Son Of Shri Mada Ram, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of Gugari Pana, Bagundi, Tilwada,
District Barmer (Raj.)
2. Vinod Singh Son Of Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Kalota, Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
3. Vikash Kumar Son Of Shri Khamichaman, Aged About
21 Years, Resident Of Kalan Nag Colony, Tehsil
Raniwara, District Jalore (Raj.)
4. Tarun Kumar Singhal Son Of Shri Madan Mohan Gupta,
Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Near Of Bhagati Girls
School, Lata House Wali Gali, Udai Moad, Gangapurcity,
District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
5. Shanker Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Daya Ram Sharma,
Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of B-20, Math Ke Paas,
Village And Post Botunda Via Deoli, Tehsil Todaraisingh,
District Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8264/2022
1. Ramesh Yadav Son Of Shri Ram Kuwar Yadav, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kithoor,
District Alwar (Raj.)
2. Rajendra Patel Son Of Shri Jagdish Patel, Aged About 25
(21 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Chawand, Tehsil
Sarada, District Udaipur (Raj.)
3. Toga Ram Son Of Shri Poora Ram, Aged About 23 Years,
Resident Of Meghwalon Ka Vaas, Ridwa, Post Hamira,
District Jaiselmer (Raj.)
4. Ravi Shankar Son Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Dadrewa, Tehsil
Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8403/2022
1. Rajesh Tak Son Of Shri Mahendra Singh Tak, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of 163/27 Gaddi Maliyan, District
Ajmer (Raj.)
2. Sohan Singh Son Of Shri Kojoo Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Piriyara, Post Manglod, Tehsil
Jayal, District Nagaur (Raj.)
3. Sachin Kumar Jeph Son Of Shri Maniram, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 15, Gurjar Colony Neem Ka
Thana, District Sikar (Raj.)
4. Ishwar Lal Meghwal Son Of Shri Hukmi Chand Meghwal,
Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Chandra
Khairi, Post Sangriya, Tehsil Bari Sadri, District
Chittorgarh (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
(22 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9326/2022
Ajit Singh Korawat S/o Jaswant Singh Korawat, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Vpo Maindwas, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan. (Roll No. 3353794).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9353/2022
Rakesh Gurjar S/o Rohitashav Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o Vpo Nangal Panditpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan. (Roll No. 4299896)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9651/2022
Sumer Singh Meena Son Of Shri Amar Singh Meena, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Lotwara, Tehsil
(23 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan
State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4106/2022
Ramkishore Choudhary Son Of Shri Ugma Ram Choudhary,
Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Ujoli, Post Kotdi,
Tehsil Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4123/2022
1. Sanwar Mal Dhaka Son Of Shri Baga Ram Dhaka, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Baloopura, Post
Khora, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
2. Vinod Kumar Son Of Shri Ounkar Mal, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Pujari Ka Bas, Bassi, Sikar (Raj.)
3. Yakin Jani Son Of Shri Kamlesh Jani, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Paloda, Tehsil
Garhi, District Banswara (Raj.)
4. Shri Ram Son Of Shri Tiku Ram, Aged About 24 Years,
(24 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Resident Of Village Ganthilasar, Nagaur (Raj.)
5. Ravi Aaswani Son Of Shri Rajkumar Aaswani, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of 166, Sindhi Colony, Pali
(Raj.)
6. Rahul Son Of Shri Gordhan Singh, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Daika, Post Pur, Tehsil
Kotkasim, District Alwar (Raj.)
7. Ravindra Sharma Son Of Shri Radheshyam Sharma,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Bhuma Bara, Jajod,
Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
8. Sunil Kumar Prajapat Son Of Shri Mangej Kumar
Prajapat, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Jyoti
Nagar, Jaipur Road, Bypass Tiraha, Dausa (Raj.)
9. Vikas Meena Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand Meena, Aged
About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Maulai, Post
Farrashpura, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.)
10. Sri Ram Bhakar Son Of Shri Surjeet Kumar Bhakar,
Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Chak 37 Mmk
Post Morjand Khari, Tehsil Sadul Shahar, District Sri
Ganganagar (Raj.)
11. Sachidanand Abhinandan Pahadiya Son Of Shri Mahesh
Prasad Gouttam, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of
Behind The Gopal Ji Temple, Village And Post Banetha,
Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk (Raj.)
12. Shailendra Singh Son Of Shri Gopal Singh, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of 178, Prithviraj Nagar, Near
Vidhasthali School, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur
(Raj.)
13. Sumit Shrivastav Son Of Shri Rajkumar Shrivastav,
Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of F-6, Kiran Vihar,
Near Triveni Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
14. Tanishq Mishra Son Of Shri Neeraj Mishra, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Qtr. No. 6162, Basanti Bhawan,
Faridabad Colony, Bhagwan Ganj, Ajmer (Raj.)
15. Saurabh Mishra Son Of Shri Bharat Lal Mishra, Aged
About 25 Years, Resident Of Gopal Nagar, Ward No. 25,
Baswa Road, Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.)
16. Vikash Saini Son Of Shri Birdi Chand Saini, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of 94, Pratap Nagar, Naai Ki Thadi,
(25 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Ramgarh Road, Lalwas, Crpf, Amer District Jaipur
(Raj.)
17. Tapendra Dhayal Son Of Shri Kishna Ram Dhayal, Aged
About 22 Years, Resident Of Jaton Ka Bas, Village
Mundi, Geloli, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur (Raj.)
18. Rakesh Kumar Son Of Shri Kumbha Ram, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kanwarpura,
Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar (Raj.)
19. Roshan Lal Saini Son Of Shri Sohan Lal Saini, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Dhani Kanuwali, Village
And Post Mandha, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4208/2022
1. Vishal Lata Son Of Shri Pawan Kumar Lata, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Pancho Ka Mohalla,
Thoi, District Sikar (Raj.)
2. Ram Chander Son Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Village Gulabgarh, Post Pallu, Tehsil
Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
3. Roshan Chaudhary Son Of Shri Jagdish Chaudhary,
Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Hemawali Dhani,
Village Mahapura, Post Mahapura, Ajmer Road
Bhankrota, Tehsil Sangner District Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Ram Babu Nagar Son Of Shri Ram Gopal Nagar, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Shiv Mandir Chowk,
Kumhar Mohalla, Sunel, Jhalawar (Raj.)
5. Raj Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand Meena,
Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Tigriya, Tehsil
Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
(26 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4246/2022
1. Vikas Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Shiv Shai Sharma,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 99, Prem
Nagar, Gurjar Ki Thadi, N.s. Road, Sodala, Jaipur
(Raj.)
2. Raghvinder Son Of Shri Baleshwar Singh, Aged About
26 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nadoti, District
Karauli (Raj.)
3. Rahul Lakhotiya Son Of Shri Rajendra Prasad, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Near Forest Office,
Station Gangrar, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
4. Ratan Singh Son Of Shri Parbat Singh, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of 193, Santo Ka Mohalla, Senai,
Tehsil Luni, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
5. Ratan Singh Son Of Shri Mangu Singh, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Tejpala, Jaiselmer (Raj.)
6. Shri Ram Choudhary Son Of Shri Khiwaram
Choudhary, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Village
And Post Nimod, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur
(Raj.)
7. Subhash Chander Son Of Shri Shankar Lal, Aged
About 30 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 14,
Budhwaliya, Rawatsar, Hanumangarh (Raj.)
8. Tara Chand Son Of Shri Bagta Ram, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Mahingoni, Moodho Ki Dhani, Lilala,
Baytu Panji, Barmer (Raj.)
(27 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
9. Raju Lal Meena Son Of Shri Badri Lal Meena, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Theekariya Meenan, Tehsil Kotkhawda, District Jaipur
(Raj.)
10. Vikash Kumar Saharan Son Of Shri Gopi Ram, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Lohasana Baran,
Tehsil Churu, District Churu (Raj.)
11. Vijay Singh Khokhar Son Of Shri Hemraj Khokhar,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Dakipura,
Post Dhankoli, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Raj.)
12. Tarun Kumar Son Of Shri Ganesharam, Aged About
28 Years, Resident Of Meghwalon Ka Baas, Sedariya
Balotan, Post Paota, Tehsil Ahore, District Jalore
(Raj.)
13. Suresh Vishnoi Son Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About
27 Years, Resident Of Village Khejarli Kallan, Tehsil
Looni, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
14. Shakti Singh Son Of Shri Roop Singh Rajpoot, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Mundoti, Post
Akodiya, Tehsil Arain, District Ajmer (Raj.)
15. Satyanarayan Jangid Son Of Shri Shravan Lal Jangid,
Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Gopipura
Colony, Post Ambapura Daulta, Tehsil Deoli, District
Tonk (Raj.)
16. Ram Niwas Jakhar Son Of Shri Pura Ram Jakhar,
Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Riri, Tehsil Sri Dungargarh, District Bikaner (Raj.)
17. Ramesh Kumar Son Of Shri Sawai Ram, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Utal, Sheo, Barmer (Raj.)
18. Rajesh Son Of Shri Prahlad Ram, Aged About 23
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kuri, Tehsil
Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
19. Sher Singh Son Of Shri Budh Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Dhadholi, Post Bahala,
Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
20. Ronak Patidar Son Of Shri Parmeshwar Patidar, Aged
About 23 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Madalda, Tehsil Garhi, District Banswara (Raj.)
21. Raj Kumar Mali Son Of Shri Asharam Mali, Aged
(28 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
About 22 Years, Resident Of 76, Nathukhedi, Dabda,
Pratapgarh (Raj.)
22. Vishnu Sharma Son Of Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of New Market Behind
Of Bohra Bhawan, City Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
23. Yogesh Kumar Son Of Shri Lekh Ram Godara, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Rajiyasar, Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar
(Raj.)
24. Saurabh Barot Son Of Shri Dinesh Barot, Aged About
32 Years, Resident Of Barot Mohalla, Santpur, Abu
Road, District Sirohi (Raj.)
25. Trilok Singh Son Of Shri Bheem Singh, Aged About 25
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Alasan, Tehsil And
District Jalore (Raj.)
26. Virendra Singh Son Of Shri Narendra Singh, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Bhunwala, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar (Raj.)
27. Rajendra Yadav Son Of Shri Maheshkumar Yadav,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Aspura,
Post Raghunathpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur
(Raj.)
28. Vikas Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal
Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village
Raniyawas, Post Rahori, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh,
District Jaipur (Raj.)
29. Ravindra Sherawat Son Of Shri Radheshyam
Sherawat, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 161,
Charanwas, Kalwar, District Jaipur (Raj.)
30. Shubham Purohit Son Of Shri Dinesh Purohit, Aged
About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Bodiyana, District
Chittorgarh (Raj.)
31. Ramesh Kumar Son Of Shri Praga Ram, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Parewar
District Jaiselmer (Raj.)
32. Deepak Kumar Choudhary Son Of Shri Leela Ram
Choudhary, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village
And Post Ranoth, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar
(Raj.)
(29 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
33. Rajendra Kumar Son Of Shri Ramdayal Regar, Aged
About 28 Years, Resident Of 92, Raigar Mohalla,
Gudaliya, Tehsil Tantoti, District Ajmer (Raj.)
34. Vikas Meena Son Of Shri Danaram Meena, Aged
About 26 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kotri,
Luharwas, Tehsil Khadela, District Sikar (Raj.)
35. Ravi Kant Sharma Son Of Shri Kamlesh Sharma,
Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Khetarmal
Dharmshala, Behind Govt. Hospital, Near Bhiwani
Medcial, Alwar (Raj.)
36. Raj Patidar Son Of Shri Kubar Patidar, Aged About 22
Years, Resident Of M.p. Silohi, Tehsil Galiyakot,
District Dungarpur (Raj.)
37. Rajesh Kumar Son Of Shri Hanjari Ram, Aged About
23 Years, Resident Of A.t. Kotda, Post Jetawar,
District Sirohi (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
(Raj.)
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. President, Rajasthan Service Selection Board,
Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini.
Mr. Aamir Khan.
Ms. Komal Giri Goswami.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Naryana.
Mr. Pradeep Kalwania.
Mr. Narendra Singh Chaudhary.
Mr. Nikhil Pal Singh.
Mr. Parth Sharma & Mr. S. Bhardwaj
for Mr. Amit Lubhaya.
(30 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
19/07/2022
Counsels for the petitioners submitted that the issues
involved in these writ petitions have been considered and decided
by the Co-ordinate Bench of this court at Principal seat Jodhpur in
the matter of Amit Swami & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan &
Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3959/2022 along with other
connected matters) wherein on 27.05.2022, following order was
passed:-
"These writ petitions have been filed by the
petitioners seeking to question the revised
answer key issued by the Rajasthan Subordinate
and Ministerial Service Selection Board ('the
Board') for recruitment to the post of Patwari
pursuant to the advertisement dated
17.01.2020, preparation of a fresh answer key
considering the objections raised by the
petitioners for the disputed questions/erroneous
answers based on the material produced by
them and reevaluation of the answer-sheets and
issuance of a fresh select list of provisionally
selected candidates.
It is, inter-alia, indicated in the petitions that
Advertisement No.3/2019 was issued by the
Board inviting online applications for direct
recruitment on the post of Patwari, competitive
written examination was held in four shifts
pursuant to the advertisement on 23.10.2021;
the preliminary answer key was issued by the
Board on 23.10.2021 and a press-note was
published, whereby online objections towards
preliminary answer key were called from the
candidates with their respective supporting
materials. The final answer key was issued by
the Board on 25.01.2022 on the basis of
decision taken by the Expert Committee on the
objections raised by the candidates and list of
two times provisionally selected candidates was
issued for the purpose of verification of
documents and credentials of the candidates.
The petitioners have questioned the validity of
large number of questions/final answers and/or
the deletion of particular questions, based on
the opinion of the Expert Committee. During the
course of submissions, the petitioners confined
(31 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
their submissions to Questions No.76 and 86 of
Question Booklet Series-104A, Questions No.141
(Master Question Booklet Question No.43) and
15 ((Master Question Booklet Question No.65) of
Question Booklet Series-104B, Questions No.135
and 141 of Question Booklet Series-104C and
Questions No.69, 76 and 98 of Question Booklet
Series-104D.
The Board, which had appeared on Caveat, was
directed to produce the experts' opinion on the
questions alongwith supporting material for
perusal of the Court, which has been produced
by the Board.
Learned counsel for the parties were heard on
various questions.
The petitioners have filed extracts from
books/material seeking to support their
contentions in relation to the validity of the
questions/ answers and the decision of the
expert committee thereon.
It would be appropriate to reproduce the
disputed questions, the final answer based on
decision of the expert committee and view of the
expert committee: -
Question No.76 of Question Booklet Series-
104A:
76. From the given pairs of words you have to
select the pair which is related in the same way
as the words of the first pair. Mustic : Guitar :
_________ : _______
(A) Water : Tank (B) Pen : Pencil
(C) Nose : Face (D) Word : Word
Processor Final Answer based on decision of the
expert committee: (A) View of the Expert
Committee: Initially the answer was (D). The
Expert Committee opined that option (A) is more
appropriate than option (D) because word
processor is a computer programme generally
used to write or process words, but as Music
Comes from Guitar, water comes from Tank.
Question No.86 of Question Booklet Series-
104A:
86. Input : more fight cats cough sough acts
idea. Which of the following steps would be the
last step for this input?
(A) III (B) IV
(C) V (D) VI
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (C) View of the Expert
Committee: The Experts, after indicating
various steps, came to the conclusion with
regard to correct answer by indicating as under:
"More fight cats cough sough acts idea Step:
I. Cough more fight cats sough acts idea
II. Cough fight sought more cats acts idea
(32 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
III. Cough fight sough acts more cats idea
IV. Cough fight sough acts cats more idea
V. Cough fight sough acts cats idea more"
Question No.43 in Master Question Booklet
(Question No.141 Question Booklet Series-
104B):
141. O;kdj.k dh n`f'V ls fuEu esa dkSu lk 'kq) okD; gS\
(A) eSaus bl dke esa cM+h v"kqf) dhA
(B) yM d + k feBkbZ ysdj Hkkxrk gqvk ?kj vk;kA
(C) eSa viuh ckr ds Li'Vhdj.k ds fy, rS;kj gw¡A
(D) jke dk ohj&xkFkk jkek;.k esa gSA
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (A) [As per Master Booklet]
Question No.65 in Master Question Booklet
(Question No.15 Question Booklet Series-
104B):
15. The survey was conducted under the
government of U.P.
(A) Definitely true (B) Data
inadequate
(C) Probably true (D) Probably
false
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (A) [As per Master Booklet].
Qua both these questions, the petitioners claim
that the answers must be different from what
was indicated in the preliminary answer key, and
the final answer key, however, as the petitioners
had not raised any objection qua the preliminary
answer key itself, though the answer now
claimed by them is different from the
preliminary answer key itself, despite grant of
the opportunity, in absence of any objection to
the preliminary answer key, the plea raised by
the petitioners now cannot be countenanced, as
the objections as raised were not before the
Expert Committee.
Question No.135 of Question Booklet
Series-104C:
135. Where is the cave of 'Saint Peepa'?
(A) Peepar (B) Toda
(C) Dhanera (D) Gagron
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (D) View of the Expert
Committee:
The Expert Committee referring to jktLFkku dk
bfrgkl ,oa laLd`fr d{kk 10 and jktLFkku&bfrgkl ,oa
laLd`fr ,ulkbDykihfM;k by Dr. Hukamchand Jain
and Narayan Mali, came to the conclusion that
correct answer is (D).
Though the petitioners have also placed on
record certain material in support of their
contentions that answer "B" is correct, however,
(33 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
as the Expert Committee has after taking into
consideration the material, as noticed herein
before, and the material produced by the
petitioners, have come to a particular
conclusion, there is apparently no reason for this
Court to substitute its opinion. Question
No.141 of Question Booklet Series-104C:
141. Jogi caste of Alwar district play which of the
following instrument?
(A) Rabaj (B) Bhapang
(C) Sarangi (D) Jantar
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (B)
The petitioners have claimed that answer "C" is
the correct answer, however, they did not raise
any objection to the preliminary answer key,
which answer has been maintained in the final
answer key by the Expert based on the material
i.e. musical repertoire of Jogi community of the
Eastern Rajasthan. In absence of any objections
raised to the preliminary answer key, which
answer has been maintained, the petitioners
cannot be heard in this regard.
Question No.69 of Question Booklet Series-
104D:
69. An Excel Workbook is a collection of
(A) Charts (B) Worksheets
(C) Charts and Worksheets (D) None of
these
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (B)
The Expert Committee has relied on NCERT Book
Computerized Accounting System Class 12th
with the indication as under: -
"A file in excel is known as a workbook. A
workbook is a collection of number of
worksheets."
It appears that the Expert Committee has
misconstrued the question itself as the question
related to the 'excel workbook', whereas the
material indicated, pertains to a file in Excel
only. The material produced by the petitioners
published by Vardhman Mahaveer Open
University, Kota indicates answer "C", which
material apparently has not been considered by
the Expert Committee and, therefore, the same
requires a re-look.
Question No.76 of Question Booklet Series-
104D:
76. In the following letter series, some of the
letters are missing which are given in that order
as one of the alternatives below it. Choose the
correct alternative. a _ bca _ bcab _ ca - bc
(A) abca (B) aaba
(C) bacb (D) baba
(34 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: Deleted
Counsel for the petitioners made objections
regarding deletion of the question, however,
failed to produce any material in support of the
challenge laid, as such plea raised by the
counsel for the petitioners cannot be
countenanced.
Question No.98 of Question Booklet Series-
104D:
98. If 'water' is called 'food', 'food' is called
'tree', 'tree' is called 'sky', 'sky' is called 'wall', on
which of the following grows a fruit?
(A) Water (B) Food
(C) Tree D) None of
these
Final Answer based on decision of the expert
committee: (B)
No material was produced by the respondents in
support of the above change of the option.
Learned counsel for the respondent Board fairly
conceded that the Board will re-consider the
option, as indicated, taking into consideration
the objections raised in the petition in this
regard.
From overall consideration of all the questions
regarding which the petitioners have raised
objections, except for Question No.69 of
Question Booklet Series-104D and Question
No.98 of Question Booklet Series-104D,
regarding which the counsel appearing for the
Board himself conceded that same required
reconsideration, the petitioners have failed to
make out any case for interference.
This Court in Phoosgir & Ors. vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.17265/2021 and other connected matters
decided on 23.03.2022, in a recruitment related
to Agriculture Supervisor, came to the following
conclusion: -
"From the above, it is apparent that the
expert committee has thoroughly
examined the objections as raised by the
petitioners and have reached to a
particular conclusion. The petitioners have
made submissions based on the material
produced by them in support of their claim
in relation to each question and the expert
committee has referred to / relied on
material in support of the conclusion
arrived at by them. As out of two
materials produced by the petitioners and
considered by the expert committee,
which material should be relied on,
essentially is in the domain of the expert
(35 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
committee and this Court, possibly cannot
after the expert committee has arrived at
a particular conclusion, opine otherwise,
unless the decision made thereon is found
to be wholly arbitrary and/ or contrary to
the material relied on, which in the
present case does not appear to be the
case.
The parameters for exercise of the
jurisdiction by this Court, qua the expert
committee opinion, have been repeatedly
laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
and Division bench of this Court.
The principle laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court, the latest being in the
case of Vikesh Kumar Gupta & Anr. v.
State of Rajasthan & Ors. : (2021) 2 SCC
309 as followed by the Division Bench in
Rajkamal Basitha v. Rajasthan High Court,
Jodhpur & Ors. : D.B.C.W.P.
No.11347/2021, decided on 21.02.2022
(at Jaipur Bench) is well settled. The
Division Bench in the case of Rajkamal
Basitha (supra) observed as under :-
"It is well settled through series of
judgments of the Supreme Court that the
judicial review of the decision of the
examining body be it in the filed of
education or in the recruitment to the
public employment, is extremely limited.
Particularly when the examination is being
conducted by an expert body and disputed
questions are scanned by specially
constituted expert committee, the Courts
are extremely slow in interfering with the
decisions of such bodies. Unless it is
pointed out that there is a glaring error or
an irrational decision has been rendered
the Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction
under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India would not interfere."
Prior to that in RPSC v. Pankaj Raj :
D.B.S.A.W. No.697/2019, decided on
29.05.2019 (at Jaipur Bench), the Division
Bench while setting aside the judgment of
the learned Single, inter-alia, observed as
under :-
"The impugned judgment in this Court's
opinion is clearly erroneous inasmuch as
the court has unwittingly donned the robe
of the decision maker: to wit, that of an
expert, in art, in concluding that one of
the choices was defective (question
No.11) and that the RPSC's explanation
about a misprint was irrelevant, because
(36 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
the answer was wrongly given. These
conclusions the court cannot arrive at, as
they amount to primary decision making-
a task which cannot be undertaken under
Article 226. The impugned judgment also
overlooked the salutary rule that in the
event of doubt, "the benefit ought to go to
the examination authority rather than to
the candidate" (Ran Vijay, supra)."
In another Division Bench judgment in
Jagdish Kumar Choudhary & Ors. v.
Rajasthan Public Service Commission :
D.B.S.A.W. No.447/2020, decided on
21.10.2021, a case where the learned
Single Judge had interfered with the
decision of the expert committee, it was
observed by the Division Bench as under:-
"In our view, the learned Single Judge
ought not to have interfered with the final
conclusion of the expert body duly
constituted by the Rajasthan Public
Service Commission having expertise in
the field. It is not necessary to refer to
large number of decisions of this Court as
well as of Supreme Court which essentially
lay down that the interference by the High
Court in matters of education and other
technical fields should be kept to the
minimum. Short reference to the decision
of the Supreme Court in the case of Richal
& Ors. Vs. Rajasthan Public Service
Commission & Ors. [2018 (8) SCC 81]
would be sufficient."
Very recently, when the learned Single
Judge interfered with the decision made
by the expert committee, in relation to the
Rajasthan State & Subordinate Services
Combined Competitive Examination held
by the RPSC, the Division Bench in RPSC
v. Ankit Sharma : D.B.S.A.W.
No.429/2022, in its order dated
23.02.2022, after referring to the
judgments in Ran Vijay Singh v. State of
U.P. & Ors. : (2018) 2 SCC 357, UPPSC v.
Rahul Singh : (2018) 7 SCC 254, Vikesh
Kumar Gupta (supra), Bihar Staff
Selection Commission & Ors. v. Arun
Kumar & Ors. : (2020) 6 SCC 362, inter-
alia, observed while staying the order of
the learned Single Judge, as under :-
"14. We have referred to the consistent
trend of the case law coming from the
Supreme Court on the subject. Broadly
the approach in such situation is that the
scope of judicial review against expert's
(37 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
opinion is extremely limited. There is a
requirement of finality to the process of
public employment. This is not to suggest
that judicial review is completely shutout;
it cannot be. However unless the situation
presents a clear cut, black and white,
open and shut choice of the decision of the
expert body being palpably wrong, the
Court would not interfere.
An element of tolerance to the minor error
or calibration is discernible since achieving
certainty and finality is also important.
The finality and perfection are sworn
enemies.
15. With this legal clarity if we revert back
to the questions with respect to which the
learned Judge objected to the conclusions
of RPSC, none of these questions would
prima facie pass the muster of extremely
high threshold provided by the Supreme
Court in series of judgments noted above.
In all cases the learned Single Judge has
gone on at considerable length to discuss
the view point of the petitioners and
material produced by them in support of
their contentions, what the expert
committee had taken into account and
why in the opinion of the learned Judge
such conclusions were wrong. At this
stage we are not inclined to go into these
questions threadbare since we do not
propose and we cannot decide these
appeals finally. Nevertheless we have
strong prima facie belief that the learned
Judge had exceeded the scope of writ
jurisdiction in the present case. No legal or
factual malafides are demonstrated nor
procedural illegality established.
It may be that in some cases there is a
grey area. That by itself would not be
sufficient for the writ court to upturn the
decision of the expert's body."
The Special Leave Petition filed against the
Division Bench order came to be rejected
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on
14.03.2022."
The above observations and the principle laid
down therein, apply with all force to the present
case as well.
In view of above factual and legal position,
wherein except for Questions No.69 and 98 of
Question Booklet Series-104D, wherein for
question No.98 of Booklet Series-104D, counsel
(38 of 38) [CW-2083/2022]
for the Board himself has conceded , none of the
objections raised by the candidates fall within
the parameters as laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court and Division Bench of this Court
and, therefore, except for the two questions, no
case for interference is made out.
Consequently, the writ petitions are partly
allowed. The respondent Board is directed to get
Questions No.69 and 98 of Booklet Series-104D
and the said questions which are differently
numbered in other Booklet Series, re-examined
by the Experts, other than those, who had
already examined the questions on the earlier
occasion and based on their conclusion, amend
the final answer key and give effect to the marks
obtained by the candidates and other
consequential changes in the result. The
objections raised in relation to rest of the
questions are rejected."
Counsel for the respondents have not disputed the
submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners.
In that view of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed
of in view of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of
this court at Principal seat Jodhpur in the matter of Amit Swami
(supra).
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/79,80,83,89,90,91,93,96,97,100,102,103,104,105,108,110,111,113,117,118,121,124,125,
128,131,136,140,145,149,154, 157,161, 162,167,200 & 212
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
