Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4632 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4951/2019
Chandra Kanti D/o Jagan Nath & ors.
----Appellants
Versus
Shikhar Chand S/o Mangilal & ors.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
07/07/2022
The counsel for appellants submits that on the basis of
agreement dated 09.01.1997, the suit for specific performance
and possession has been filed in the year 2013, which was
decreed vide judgment and decree dated 18.02.2015 in ex-parte
against the appellants. The trial court has dismissed their
application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC vide impugned order.
Learned counsel for respondent-plaintiffs submits that they
are in possession of the suit property and in pursuance to the
impugned decree, the execution of sale deed is to be registered.
Heard.
Admit.
Since respondent has already appeared, no need to issue
notice.
Service stands complete.
In the meanwhile, the execution of the impugned ex-parte
decree dated 18.02.2015 shall remain stayed with further
direction that both parties shall maintain status quo as to
(2 of 2) [CMA-4951/2019]
alienation and possession of the property in question in question,
as it exists today.
The stay application stands disposed of accordingly.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/1
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!