Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 479 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Sales Tax Revision / Reference No. 26/2020
M/s B.R. Oil Mills, Nai Mandi, Bharatpur
----Petitioner
Versus
Commercial Taxes Officer, Anti Evasion, Bharatpur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Punit Singhvi through VC
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
19/01/2022
This revision petition is filed against the order of the
Rajasthan Tax Board rejecting the application of the petitioner for
rectification. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the documents on record. We do not find any reason to
interfere looking to the limited scope of rectification proceedings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner however vehemently
contended that question of taking credit on the basis of C-form
issued by the purchasing dealer has been decided by the learned
Single Judge of this Court in case of Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs.
Commercial Taxes Officer, Anti Evasion, Jodhpur and
Another reported in (2016) 13 RGSTR 127 (RHC). The
Tribunal therefore ought to have reversed its original opinion. We
notice that the Tribunal in the impugned order has recorded that
there are factual differences on account of which the ratio laid
down in the said judgment of this Court would not apply.
(2 of 2) [STR-26/2020]
We can examine the wider legal challenges only against base
order passed by the Tribunal and not within the narrow confines of
rectification jurisdiction.
Thus giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the original
order, this revision petition which is directed only against
rectification order is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J (AKIL KURESHI),CJ
KAMLESH KUMAR/84
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!