Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 147 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6192/2020
Narpat Singh S/o Devi Singh and Ors.
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan and Anr.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prameshwar Lal Pilania) Mr. Goverdhan Singh) through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
06/01/2022
By way of filing of the instant miscellaneous petition
challenge has been made to the order dated 09.10.2018 passed
by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur Shekhawati,
District Sikar, Rajasthan in a case arose out of FIR No. 66/2017
(FR No. 24/17) whereby learned Magistrate, on a protest made by
the complainant, took cognizance of offence under Sections 323 &
504 IPC and proceeded against the petitioners.
A revision filed against the same has been dismissed vide
order dated 15.10.2020 by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Fatehpur, District Sikar in Criminal Revision Petition No. 22/2019.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
allegations leveled by the complainant-respondent against the
petitioners were a counter blast to the FIR lodged at the behest of
the petitioners wherein the complainant party was chargesheeted.
The FIR lodged at the instance of the complaint was thoroughly
investigated by the Police and thereafter, a negative final report
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-6192/2020]
came to be submitted before the learned Magistrate wherein after
hearing learned counsel for the complainant, the impugned order
has been passed.
Learned counsel further submits that after conducting
thorough investigation, a detailed negative final report was
submitted, however, the learned Magistrate before proceeding to
take cognizance of the offence, has not considered the grounds
made by the Investigating Officer in the FR. Learned counsel has
placed reliance on the following judgments:- Gopal Sharma &
Ors. v. State of Rajasthan [(2005) 3 RCD 473 Rajasthan];
Bhagwan Sahai Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
[(2006) 1 RLW 640]; Javed Akhtar v. State of Rajasthan
[(2007) 1 RCC 74]; Narendrapal Kotadia & Ors. v. State
[(2004) 3 RLR 92].
In view of the above, it is imperative upon the learned
Magistrate to consider the grounds of final report before taking
cognizance of the offences.
The matter requires consideration.
Issue notice.
Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the
State.
Issue notice only to the respondent No. 2.
List the matter after eight weeks.
In the meanwhile, further proceeding in the matter shall
remain stayed.
(FARJAND ALI),J
SAHIL/16
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!