Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 133 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6417/2021
1. Dinesh Kumar Singh Son Of Shri Ram Raksha Singh, Aged
About 51 Years, Resident Of G 8/2, Prime Rose Society,
Sector-15, Kharghar , Police Station Kharghar, Navi
Mumbai, District Raigarh, Maharashtra.
2. Uddhav Poddar Son Of Shri Gaurishankar Poddar, Aged
About 40 Years, Resident Of House No. E-504, Greater
Kailash Part-2, Police Station Chitranjan Park, New Delhi (
South).
3. Madan Gopal Gattani Son Of Shri Merudan Gattani, Aged
About 69 Years, Resident Of House No. 2/22, Sarvosapri
Vihar, Hojkhas, Police Station Hojkhas, New Delhi
(South).
4. Ashok Tahelani Son Of Shri P.d Tahelani, Aged About 59
Years, Resident Of House No. 376, Mandakani Enclave,
Alaknanda Kalkaji, Police Station Chitranjan Park, New
Delhi ( South).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Dinesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Radheyshyam
Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, Office At 635, 6 th Floor,
Jaipur Electronic Mall, Riddhi Siddhi Circle, Gopalpura
Bypass, Jaipur Presently Residing At 401 A, Manglam
Arparn, Patrakar Colony, Police Station Mansarovar,
Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Joshi, Adv. Through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP Mr. Mohammad Jubeir, Adv.
through V.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order
06/01/2022
1. Instant criminal Miscellaneous petition has been filed under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the First Information Report
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-6417/2021]
No.0533/2021 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District
Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan for offences under Sections 420,
406, 504 and 379 of IPC.
2. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the parties
have settled their dispute by way of compromise. Counsel relied
upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
matter of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in
2012(10) SCC 303 and prayed that the FIR pending against the
petitioner be quashed in view of the compromise between the
parties.
3. Learned counsel for the complainant-respondent appearing
through Video Conferencing and admitted the fact of compromise
between the parties.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case
and the fact that the parties have settled their dispute by way of
compromise and also following the judgment passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Gian Singh (supra), the
criminal misc. petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in
connection with the said First Information Report No.0533/2021
registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City
(South) and all consequential proceedings, qua the petitioners,
are hereby quashed.
6. The stay application also stands disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J
Aks/-41
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!