Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Cheena Vaishnav vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 1247 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1247 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dr. Cheena Vaishnav vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 January, 2022
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1015/2022

Dr. Cheena Vaishnav D/o Shri Sohan Lal Vaishnav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o G-186 Subhash Nagar Extension, Bhilwara.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Secretary, Central Board Of Secondary Education, Todar Mal Marg Ajmer, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramsukh Mali for Mr. Shreedhar Purohit through V.C.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Khatri through V.C.

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

27/01/2022

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue

involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the

judgment dated 03.06.2021, passed by Hon'ble the Supreme

Court in the case of Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through

Guardian/Father Hari Singh) Vs. C.B.S.E. (Cnetral Board of

Secondary Education) & Ors. in Civil Appeal No.3905/2011.

2. He submits that in light of the judgment of Jigya Yadav

(supra), the respondent - C.B.S.E. is supposed to correct

petitioner's date of birth in its record.

3. Mr. Khatri, learned counsel for the respondents is not in a

position to dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law.

(2 of 2) [CW-1015/2022]

4. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the

petitioner to file a fresh application for change/correction in

petitioner's date of birth alongwith all requisite documents as

required by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the judgment of Jigya

Yadav (supra).

5. In case, application is filed with requisite fees and documents

within a period of three weeks from today, the Central Board of

Secondary Education shall consider the same in accordance with

law, particularly in light of the judgment passed by Hon'ble the

Supreme Court rendered in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra) and do

the needful within a period of eight weeks of receiving the

application.

6. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 30-Ramesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter