Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1159 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022
(1 of 3) [CW-1222/2013]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1222/2013
Sukha Ram Meghwal
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj. And Anr.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Varsha Bissa, on VC
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, on VC
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
25/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, the lawyers have been advised
to refrain from coming to the Courts.
The petitioner has preferred this writ petition claiming for the
following reliefs:-
"(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated
07.01.2013 cancelling the allotment being made in favour of the
petitioner, may kindly be declared illegal and be quashed and
set aside.
(ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents
may kindly be directed to re-allot the quarter no.157 in the
name of the petitioner.
(iii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents
may kindly be ensured that the compliance of the judgment of
High Court is done within a time bound framework and he shall
be again given the allotment."
(Downloaded on 28/01/2022 at 08:26:39 PM)
(2 of 3) [CW-1222/2013]
Counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court
to Annex.2, which is dated 17.07.2009, whereby the petitioner
who is at Sr. No.28, his services has been regularized with effect
from the date of his appointment i.e. 07.12.2007. Thus,
admittedly the petitioner is a Government Servant as declared in
order dated 17.07.2009 w.e.f. 07.12.2007.
The Scheme of JDA, which is "Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay
Nagar" at Basni Tamboliya was launched on 13.08.2008 and the
petitioner applied under the said Scheme on 26.08.2008. The
petitioner has also deposited the amount on 16.11.2009, as
required to be paid under the Scheme and accordingly Quarter
No.157 at Basni Tamboliya was issued to him but later the same
was cancelled vide order dated 07.01.2013.
Counsel for the respondent submits that Annex.2 was not
brought on record by the petitioner earlier and, thus, he opposed
the writ petition.
This Court on seeing the fact that the petitioner's services
have been regularized as Class-IV employee w.e.f. 07.12.2007
and the Scheme itself is of 2008, which brings the petitioner
within the purview of allotment, is inclined to allow this writ
petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The order dated
07.01.2013 cancelling the allotment of quarter made in favour of
the petitioner is quashed and set aside. The allotment order dated
09.11.2009 whereby quarter no.157 was allotted to the petitioner
shall regain currency.
(Downloaded on 28/01/2022 at 08:26:39 PM)
(3 of 3) [CW-1222/2013]
The possession of said quarter be handed-over to the
petitioner within a period of three months from today.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
48-Sanjay/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!