Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1149 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022
(1 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17820/2019
Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Vipin Kumar Jain S/o Shri Rama Shankar,, By Caste Jain, Resident Of Subhkamna, Current Balaji Road, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17821/2019 Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Bahadur Singh S/o Shri Dal Chand Ji,, Resident Of Asha Current Balaji Road, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17822/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee, Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
(2 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
2. Ram Chandra Prajapati S/o Shri Sugan Chand, Resident Of Kumharon Ka Mohalla, Nagpuriyon Ki Gali, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17823/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Upper Primary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, B/c Jain R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, B/c Jain R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Sanjay Kumar Jain S/o Shri Tara Chand Ji, R/o Village Lamba Harisingh, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17826/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Upper Primary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu, District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Sanjeev Jain S/o Shri Devendra Kumar Jain,, Resident Of Village Daga Ki Gali, Near Bada Jain Mandir, Sarawagi Bas, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17827/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Upper Primary School, Ladnu, Through
(3 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, B/c Jain R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, B/c Jain R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Peeramal Dayma S/o Shri Narayan Prasad, R/o Ward No.
21. Birol Road, Chuna Chowk, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17828/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee, Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Ratan Lal Soni S/o Shri Durgadutt Soni, By Caste Soni, Resident Of Behind Sainik School, Ward No. 24, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17829/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Upper Primary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, B/c Jain R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, B/c Jain R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
(4 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Laxmikant Bhojak S/o Shri Mangi Lal Bhojak, R/o Village Bhojak Colony, Near Railway Station, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17830/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Upper Primary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu, District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Dhirendra Kumar Jain S/o Shri Jai Pakash Jain,, Resident Of C/o Milap Stationer, Behind State Bank Of India, Rahu Gate, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17832/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee, Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director-Cum-Commissioner, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Jai Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Bajrang Singh Chouhan,
(5 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
Resident Of Maliyon Ka Bas, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17833/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director Cum Commissioner, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Mahaveer Prasad Swami S/o Shri Vallabhdas Swami, By Caste Swami, Resident Of Parkihon Ka Naya Bas, Near Power House, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17834/2019
1. Shree Mahaveer Senior Secondary School, Ladnu, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
2. Management Committee Shri Digamber Jain Siksha Pracharak Trust, Kolkata, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Pahadiya, Age About 50 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o Ladnu District Nagaur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The Director Cum Commissioner, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Sanjay Kumar Jain S/o Shri Dharmchand Godha, Resident Of Maliyon Ka Bas, Ladnu, District Nagaur.
----Respondents
(6 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Sharma on VC
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hemant Choudhary, GC a/w
Mr. Vishal Jangid, Dy. GC on VC
Mr. Sushil Solanki on VC
Ms. Bhawna Jangid on VC
Mr. Yogendra Singh Charan on VC
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
25/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to
refrain from coming to the Courts.
The brief facts as noticed by this Court are that the
petitioner-institution was in existence from more than 110 years,
but has now been closed since 01.07.2011. After a prolonged
litigation between the teachers and the Institution, Rajasthan
Non-Government Education Tribunal, Jaipur passed the judgment
on 13.12.2017 allowing the payments of salary, gratuity, selection
grade etc.
Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner makes
a categorical statement that he is not challenging the order of
Tribunal on merits, which has been passed on 13.12.2017.
Upon such statement, the contest over the rights accrued
out of the judgment passed by the Tribunal comes to an end and
is no more required to get adjudicated.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only prayer of
the petitioner-Institution is that the execution proceedings, which
are being initiated by the Civil Judge, Ladnu in execution petition
no.2/2018 and other analogous execution petitions be stayed, as
(7 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
the execution court has passed the order of attachment and
auction of the property in question on different dates.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since
the Institution is closed since 2011 and the liability accrued has to
be borne by the Institution, therefore, the petitioner be permitted
to sell a part of the property situated at Khasra No.1528 in Ladnu
measuring about 02 bigha, 13 biswa and Khasra No.1673
measuring about 27.08 bigha.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his
instructions the petitioner is confident that if he is permitted to
sell 9 bigha of land out of total 27.08 bigha land situated at
Khasra No.1673, he shall be in a position to satisfy the total claim
of all private teachers in this particular matter and the matters
attached to the extent of liability of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the
petitioner be given two months' time to complete the sale of
aforesaid 9 bigha of land which shall satisfy the complete liability.
Learned counsel for Secondary Education and Elementary
Department categorically state that they already have the
complete details of the payment to be made, which is the due
drawn statement, to the teachers and the same shall be provided
to the executing court within a period of 30 days from today, if not
already completed.
Learned counsel Mr. Sushil Solanki and Mr. Yogendra Singh
Charan, who are representing the teachers do not object to the
proposal of sale of 9 bigha given by the counsel for the petitioner
and fairly submits that the outcome of the sale proceeds be given
to the teachers so as to satisfy their claims.
(8 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
After hearing learned counsel for the parties at length and
perusing the record of the case, this Court finds that the compass
of the controversy is very narrow, as the teachers' right has been
crystallized by the judgment of Rajasthan Non-Government
Education Tribunal, Jaipur, which is not under challenge. The
limited challenge before this Court is the process of execution,
which involves auction and attachment of the property of the
petitioner-institution, which they seek to sell by themselves, while
assuring that they shall clear all the requisite dues as ordered by
the executing court arising on the part of the institution to the
respective teachers.
On the aforesaid observations and submission, the present
writ petitions are allowed with following directions;
(i) The complete details of the payment due as per the
order of Rajasthan Non-Government Education Tribunal,
Jaipur be prepared by the executing court within a period of
30 days from today with the help of the Secondary Education
and Elementary Department.
(ii) The Secondary Education and Elementary Department
shall furnish all the details regarding the requisite dues
arising out of the Tribunal's order, which has to be paid to
the executing court within a period of 30 days from today.
(iii) The executing court shall bifurcate the dues in
accordance with the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in
State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. The Management Committee,
Shri Bhagwan Das Todi College reported in 2016 (2) WLC
(Raj.) 1 and inform the petitioner-institution as to what is the
amount, which is required to be paid by them to their share.
(9 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
(iv) The amount to be paid by the State shall be paid by
State within a period of three months from now and the
same shall be disbursed by the executing court by adopting
due process of law.
(v) The petitioner-Institution shall provide the executing
court with a draft sale-deed for 09 bigha of land situated at
Khasra No.1673. Executing court shall thereafter permit the
petitioner to undertake the sale of the property as described
in the sale-deed within a period of 60 days from today. The
executing court shall be free to impose any additional
conditions for ensuring smooth completion of the exercise.
The petitioner shall thereafter disburse the proceeds of sale
to the teachers in-question to satisfy the liability of the
Institution. The executing court shall thereafter record
satisfaction of the teachers regarding the due amount from
the Institution to the petitioner-institution having been
received.
(vi) The rest of attached property shall be released by the
executing court after complete payment to the teachers is
made by the institution in accordance with the conjoint
reading of law laid down in Bhagwan Das Todi (supra) and
Tribunal's order. In case, the complete amount to the share
of the institution, which has to be borne by the
petitioner-Institution itself, is not paid within a period of 60
from today then the executing court shall be free to auction
the property in question and take all steps for execution
strictly in accordance with law.
(vii) The amount of Rs.20 lacs, which has been deposited by
means of interim order of this Court before the executing
(10 of 10) [CW-17820/2019]
court, shall be released to the petitioner-institution on
confirmation by the executing court that the amount due
from the institution has been paid to each of the teachers in
these matters.
(viii) The present order gives complete liberty to the
executing court to do the necessary execution to the share of
the State. The present adjudication is only with a view to
enable the Institution to clear its dues with protection to the
property of Institution. The private property is being
protected partly on the condition that petitioner shall abide
by the judgment of the Tribunal in the spirit of Bhagwan Das
Todi (supra).
In case the teachers due remains, the executing court shall
be free to go ahead with the execution proceedings regarding rest
of the land in-question.
All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
104-115-Nirmala/Sanjay/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!