Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamlesh Kumhar D/O Shri Duli Chand vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 2788 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2788 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Kamlesh Kumhar D/O Shri Duli Chand vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 April, 2022
Bench: Inderjeet Singh
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                       BENCH AT JAIPUR
             S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4535/2022
Kamlesh Kumhar D/o Shri Duli Chand, Aged About 35 Years,
Resident Of Prathmik Svasty Kendra Vala Mohalla, Raithal, Baran
(Raj.)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And
       Health (Group-2), Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.     Chief Medical And Health Officer, Baran (Raj.)
3.     Medical Officer In-Charge, Community Health Centre,
       Anta Road, Seeshwali, District Baran (Raj.)
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 01/04/2022

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the

following prayer:-

"It is, therefore humbly prayed that Your Lordship may kindly be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition of the humble petitioners and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:

1. Quash and set aside the order dated 03.02.2022 and allow the petitioner to work on the post of Assistant Radiographer at Community Health Centre, Sheeshwali, Baran with all the consequential benefits.

2. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deem just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner."

Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed

on the post of Assistant Radiographer in the office of respondents

purely on contract basis vide order dated 15.06.2013 and since

then she has been continuing in service on her period of contract

being extended on mutual consent from time to time. However,

vide order dated 03.02.2022 when services of the petitioner were

(2 of 3) [CW-4535/2022]

terminated by the respondents she approached this Court by filing

the present writ petition. As evident from the order/circular dated

04.10.2014, the services of the contractual employee can continue

only upto the period till the regularly selected candidates are

made available and in light of the said order/circular, the petitioner

being contract employee, her services have been terminated by

the respondents vide order dated 03.02.2022, as the regularly

selected candidates joined on 01.02.2022.

Counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the pleadings and

grounds mentioned in the writ petition, submitted that in the

identical facts, a coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of

Sunil Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.13233/2021) vide order dated 18.11.2021 has granted

interim protection and prayed that the similar order be passed in

the present case also.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'State of

Maharashtra and Ors. vs. Anita and Ors.', reported in (2016)

8 Supreme Court Cases 293, wherein para No.16, it has been

held as under:-

"16. The above terms of the agreement further reiterate the stand of the State that the appointments were purely contractual and that the Respondents shall not be entitled to claim any right or interest of permanent service in the government. The appointments of Respondents were made initially for eleven months but were renewed twice and after serving the maximum contractual period, the services of the Respondents came to an end and the Government initiated a fresh process of selection. Conditions of Respondents' engagement is governed by the terms of agreement. After having accepted

(3 of 3) [CW-4535/2022]

contractual appointment, the Respondents are estopped from challenging the terms of their appointment. Furthermore, Respondents are not precluded from applying for the said posts afresh subject to the satisfaction of other eligibility criteria."

Admittedly, the petitioner is a contractual employee and

according to the order/circular dated 04.10.2014 the services of

the contractual employee can continue upto the period till the

regularly selected candidates are made available in the

department and as the regularly selected candidates already

joined service on 01.02.2022, the services of the petitioner being

purely contractual came to an end automatically.

This writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be

dismissed for the reasons; firstly regularly selected candidates

have already joined service as Assistant Radiographer, as such

services of the petitioner being contractual automatically came to

an end; secondly services of contractual employee are governed

by the terms and conditions of the contract, therefore in view of

the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter

of State of Maharashtra (supra), the interim order passed by the

Coordinate Bench in the matter of Sunil Kumar Sharma (supra),

relied upon by counsel for the petitioner is of no help to the

petitioner; thirdly in view of the reasons assigned above, I am not

inclined to exercise jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India.

In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

JYOTI /115

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter