Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6999 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence App. No. 1015/2021
IN
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1660/2021
Latoor Lal S/o Deva Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bhojgarh
Police Station Basoli, District Bundi (Raj) (Presently Confined In
District jail Bundi )
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
29/11/2021
1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
2. The appellant has filed the appeal along with
application for suspension of sentence.
3. The appeal has been preferred against the judgment
dated 13.08.2021 passed by court of Special Court, POCSO Act
and Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005, No. 2,
Bundi (Raj.) in Sessions Case No. 103/2020 by which the
appellant has been convicted for offence/s under Sections 447,
376 of IPC and sentenced to maximum term of ten years
imprisonment.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
(2 of 3) [SOSA-1015/2021]
appellant that appellant has been falsely implicated in the case.
There are several material contradictions and infirmities in the
prosecution evidence. PW1-prosecutrix has stated in her
examination that the offence was committed by the appellant in
20 feet deep pit in the farm. Due to which, there were injuries on
her legs. Foru Lal came there and tried to stop the appellant, then
appellant ran behind Foru Lal holding a kulhadi in his hand. In her
statements given to the police Ex.D1, she has stated that her
husband was working in nearby farm. But her husband has stated
that his wife reported the matter to him in the evening. Doctor-
PW4 has stated that during medical examination of the
prosecutrix, no external injuries were found on her body. PW6-
Manohari, PW8-Foru Lal have turned hostile and not supported the
prosecution case. Appellant is behind bars since 30.07.2020.
Hearing of the appeal may take long time.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application
for suspension of sentence.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record.
7. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the parties, evidence available on record and overall
facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon
merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to allow the
application for suspension of sentence.
8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence
is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
appellant Latoor Lal S/o Deva Meena shall remain suspended till
(3 of 3) [SOSA-1015/2021]
disposal of this criminal appeal and he shall be released on bail
provided the appellant furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/-
(One Lakh) and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) each
to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance in
this Court on 03.01.2022 and as and when called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Pooja /27
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!