Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinita Kumari W/O Shri Narendra ... vs State Of Rajasthan Through ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1344 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1344 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Vinita Kumari W/O Shri Narendra ... vs State Of Rajasthan Through ... on 8 February, 2021
Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14495/2018

1.      Vinita Kumari W/o Shri Narendra Singh, Aged About 31
        Years, Resident Of Ward No.5, Shyopura, Chanrapura,
        Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2.      Ashok Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Omprakash Gurjar, Aged
        About 27 Years, Resident Of Jagan Ka Poora, Badbajidpur,
        Post Kaimari, Teh. Nadauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
3.      Giriraj Kumar Patidar S/o Nand Lal Patidar, Aged About 32
        Years,     Resident     Of     Chachhlaav          Teh.   Pidawa,    Distt.
        Jhalawar (Raj.)
                                                                    ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Medical
        And Health Services, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2.      The Director, Medical And Health Service, Swasthya
        Bhawan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
3.      The Addl. Director (Admn.), Medical And Health Services,
        Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
4.      The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jaipur-Ist, Jaipur
        (Raj.)
5.      The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jaipur-2Nd, Jaipur
        (Raj.)
                                                                  ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Tyagi, Dy.G.C.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Order

08/02/2021 This matter comes up on an early listing application.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that issue raised

in the present writ petition stands finally concluded in the bunch of

writ petitions as lead case Sunita & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan,

(2 of 3) [CW-14495/2018]

SB Civil Writ Petition No.838/2020, decided vide order dated

19.02.2020 wherein this court passed the following directions:

"6. In view of the judgement as rendered by the coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, the petitioners in the present bunch of writ petitions are held entitled to be given the benefit of bonus marks on the basis of their experience certificates for the respective posts. The petitioners shall submit a copy of this judgement along with an application before the respondents mentioning the posts for which they have applied and the respondents shall consider the experience certificate and if the same is found to be in order, shall accordingly allot marks to the petitioners by adding bonus marks. The inclusion of the petitioners in the select list on the basis of addition of the aforesaid bonus marks would, however, be always subject to scrutiny of their experience certificate and even after appointment, if later on, it is found that the experience certificate submitted by them is in any manner having any mistake or is forged, the concerned incumbent would be given a show cause notice and thereafter his services can be dispensed with after examining reply."

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners

had preferred this writ petition wherein while issuing notices, the

State Government was directed by the court vide order dated

13.7.2018 as under:

"In the meanwhile, the State-respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner(s) provisionally in the recruitment process involved herein, accepting his/her/their application forms offline and reckoning the period of experience on the basis of certificates subject to verification before appointment orders are made. However, participation of the petitioner(s) in the recruitment process involved herein shall remain subject to final outcome on this writ application."

Learned counsel submits that the respondents have however

not considered the experience certificate of the petitioners as their

writ petition is pending.

In view of the directions issued by this court in the case of

Sunita & ors. (supra), the present writ petition is also disposed of

(3 of 3) [CW-14495/2018]

in the aforesaid terms. The petitioners shall submit their

application along with judgment within a period of two weeks

henceforth and the necessary exercise shall be completed within

two weeks thereafter.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed.

All pending application/s also stand disposed of.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

NITIN /67

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter