Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5357 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2022
261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-429-2022
Date of Decision: 26.05.2022
Dharminder Singh ...Petitioner
vs.
Balwinder Singh ...Respondent
Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia.
Present: Mr. Ranjivan Singh, Advocate with
Ms. Kanika Toor, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. M.J.S. Bedi, Advocate for
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
***
B.S. Walia, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in the petition is for initiating proceedings against the
respondent for intentional and willful defiance of judgment, Annexure
P/1 dated 26.10.2021 and order Annexure P/3 dated 17.02.2021, in
CRM-M-45677-2019.
2. A perusal of judgment / order Annexures P/1 and P/3
reveals that the petition for pre-arrest bail filed by the respondent was
allowed by taking into account the statement of learned counsel for the
respondent that FIR being outcome of a monetary dispute between the
parties had been compromised and the respondent had paid a sum of
Rs.13,00,000/- and only interest remained outstanding which the
respondent would pay to the petitioner (complainant) within three
months.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that
pursuant to the issuance of notice, the respondent has made payment to
the petitioner in terms of Annexure P/1 and P/3, therefore, the petitioner 1 of 2
COCP-429-2022 [2]
is not interested in pursuing the instant petition and may be permitted to
withdraw the same.
4. In view of the position noted above, as well as statement of
learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of as not
calling for any action against the respondent, under the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971.
(B.S. Walia) Judge 26.05.2022 rajesh
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!