Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandrika Singh vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 84 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 84 Patna
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Chandrika Singh vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 19 January, 2026

Author: Partha Sarthy
Bench: Partha Sarthy
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1873 of 2017
     ======================================================
     Chandrika Singh Son of Sukhadeo Singh, resident of Village- Kothian, P.S.
     Didarganj, District- Patna at present in the 4th Grade Service in Saran Nahar
     Pramandal, Gandak Yojana Marhaura under the respondent No. 7, Executive
     Engineer, Siwan, Water Resources, P.S. and District- Siwan.

                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.   The State of Bihar
2.   The Secretary, Water Resources Department of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan,
     Patna- 1.
3.   The Addl. Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar,
     Sinchai Bhawan, Patna-1.
4.   The Engineer-in-chief North Bihar, Water           Resources    Department,
     Government of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna-1.
5.   The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar,
     Sinchai Bhawan, Patna-1.
6.   The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Saran Nahar
     Pramandal, Siwan, P.S. and District- Siwan.
7.   The Executive Engineer, Saran Nahar Pramandal, Siwan, Water Resources
     Department, P.S. and District - Siwan.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Sumant Kumar Singh, AC to GA- 2
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

     Date : 19-01-2026

                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

      counsel for the respondents.

                     2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for

      the following reliefs:

                                                  "1. i. for issuance of
                                   appropriate writ for quashing of the
                                   letter dated 13.01.2017 issued under
 Patna High Court CWJC No.1873 of 2017 dt.19-01-2026
                                           2/5




                                         the signature of Executive Engineer,
                                         Saran Nahar Pramandal Maharajganj
                                         vide letter No. 28 to the petitioner
                                         whereby the petitioner has been
                                         ordered      to      discharge     from     the
                                         engagement as tractor driver from
                                         12.02.2017

i.e. one month after the issuance of this letter dated 13.01.2017.

ii. for giving a direction to the authority not to disturb the petitioner from discharging his duty.

iii. for other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for."

3. Bereft of unnecessary details, it may be stated

here that as per the petitioner's case, he was appointed initially

in the year 1979 as a daily wage tractor driver in Punpun Flood

Protection Division, Anishabad. The petitioner moved this Court

in C.W.J.C. no. 4909 of 1996 which case along with others came

to be disposed off by order dated 12.1.1999 directing the State

Government and other respondents to pay the salary in the scale

of pay admissible to Class-IV posts.

4. It further transpires from the records of the case

that the case of the petitioner and few others came to be

considered for their regularization of service. The respondents

passed an order contained in Memo no. 1218 dated 16.4.2012 Patna High Court CWJC No.1873 of 2017 dt.19-01-2026

under the signature of the Chief Engineer, Water Resources

Department, Siwan. Taking note of the facts that no

advertisement was issued at the time of the petitioner's

appointment, no list was obtained from the employment

exchange nor any examination was conducted, the Chief

Engineer rejected the case of the petitioner for regularization of

their service on the basis of the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka

and Ors. vs. Umadevi (3) and Ors; (2006) 4 SCC 1. It further

transpires from the order dated 16.4.2012 that the Chief

Engineer also took into consideration the facts that the petitioner

had not been able to produce any evidence to the effect that their

appointment had been made against sanctioned vacant post and

the appointment had taken place as per the procedure

established in law. The respondents had not been able to show

that the appointing authority had the powers to appoint at the

relevant time and in fact the petitioner and others had been

working on daily wages.

5. It is not in dispute that the order dated 16.4.2012

giving detailed reasons and rejecting the case of the petitioner

for regularization of their service was not challenged in any

Court.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1873 of 2017 dt.19-01-2026

6. At this stage, it is submitted by learned counsel

for the petitioner that even thereafter, the respondents continue

to take work from the petitioner and to pay him salary as a daily

wage tractor driver. However, the petitioner was surprised to

receive a letter no. 86 dated 14.2.2017, brought on record as

annexure to I.A. no. 1607 of 2017 wherein it was ordered that a

sum of Rs. 1,88,144/- had been paid in excess to the petitioner

and after adjustment of Rs. 1,62,056/-, a sum of Rs. 24,088/-

still remained recoverable.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

having perused the material on records, so far as challenge in

the writ application to the order of discharge from engagement

as tractor driver from 12.2.2017 is concerned, in the opinion of

the Court, the case of the petitioner for regularization having

already been rejected vide order dated 16.4.2012 and the same

having remained unchallenged, the Court finds no merit in the

instant application and the same is dismissed.

8. So far as challenge to the order/communication

dated 14.2.2017 ordering recovery of further amount of Rs.

24,088/- as also the total amount of Rs. 1,88,144/- is concerned,

the petitioner may file a representation before the Engineer in

Chief (North Bihar), Water Resources Department, Government Patna High Court CWJC No.1873 of 2017 dt.19-01-2026

of Bihar (respondent no. 4) within a period of four weeks.

9. In case, such a representation is filed along with

supporting documents, the same shall be decided by the

respondent concerned within a period of two months from the

date of its filing and the order passed therein shall be

communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.

10. The writ application stands disposed off with

the above observations and direction.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          20.1.2026
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter