Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nitish Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar
2026 Latest Caselaw 489 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 489 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Nitish Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2026

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2494 of 2026
     ======================================================
     Nitish Chaudhary Son of Binda Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Daruara, P.S-
     Noorsarai, District- Nalanda (Bihar).

                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                     Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Home
     Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Director General of Home Guard Force, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, Nalanda.
4.   The District Superintendent of Police, Nalanda.
5.   The District Commandant, Home Guard, Nalanda.
6.   The District Development Officer, Nalanda.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Shovendra Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Government Pleader 26
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 16-02-2026

1. The Writ petition is filed for issuance of

direction to the respondent authorities in the nature

of mandamus for permitting the petitioner to join the

post of Home-Guard in concern district or block as

the petitioner has completed all required corum i.e.

qualifications and physical test.

2. The brief facts culled out of the Writ

petition are that the petitioner has applied for the

post of Home-Guard for the Patna High Court CWJC No.2494 of 2026 dt.16-02-2026

notification/Advertisement No. 01/2025 published by

the State of Bihar. The petitioner appeared in the

physical test on 21.06.2025 at Deepnagar Stadium,

Bihar Sharif, Nalanda District and his name was

figured at Serial No. 17 in the list. During police

verification of character, it was found that a criminal

case is pending against the petitioner vide Nursarai

P.S. Case No. 323 of 2021 dated 19.09.2021 under

Section 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act and the petitioner

was on bail vide order dated 28.09.2021 and the said

case is pending before the learned A.D.J.-II-cum-

Special Excise Court, Biharsharif, Nalanda. It is

specific contention of the petitioner that he was not

involve in the criminal case and he does not live in

Noorsarai and he was the resident of Lakhrawan,

Post-Pachori, P.S. Deepnagar, in this connection

Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Pachuri has issued

certificate regarding his living status, and therefore,

prayed to direct the respondents to select him as

Home-Guard.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2494 of 2026 dt.16-02-2026

3. Heard the Learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the

respondent-State.

4. The record reveals that a criminal case is

pending against the petitioner vide Nursarai P.S.

Case No. 323 of 2021 for the offence punishable

under Section 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act and the said

case is pending against A.D.J. - II-cum-Special Excise

Court, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

5. The certificate, which was given by the

Mukhiya, only disclose that he is a resident of

Lakhrawan village and not the resident of Noorsarai.

However, it is specifically admitted by the petitioner

himself that Noorsarai is his in-laws place and it is a

matter of fact to be adjudicated by the criminal

court.

6. It is contended by the Learned counsel for

the respondents that in view of pendency of the

criminal case against the petitioner, he was not

selected and there is no error or irregularity in not

selecting the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2494 of 2026 dt.16-02-2026

7. Therefore, this Court is of the considerable

opinion that there is no irregularity in not selecting

the petitioner.

8. In view of the above said observation, the

Writ petition is dismissed as it is devoid of merits.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          20.02.2026
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter