Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 485 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18744 of 2025
======================================================
Badal Kumar S/o Vijay Kumar, R/o 34/7a, Sri Krishna Nagar, Road No. 25
Near SBI Shri Krishna Nagar, Patna Sadar, P.S.- Buddha colony Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Additional Secretary, Social Welfare
Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Disabled Empowerment Directorate (Social Welfare
Department) Bihar, Patna.
4. The Deputy Director, Disable Empowerment Directorate (Social Welfare
Department) Bihar, Patna.
5. The Assistant Director, Disable Empowerment Directorate (Social Welfare
Department) Bihar, Patna.
6. The District Magistrate, Patna.
7. Umang Bal Vikas Sansthan Awasiya Divyang Prashikshak Sansthan,
Fairfield Colony, Digha Ghat, Patna, Bihar who has been Selected for
conducting the Ashra Home, Indrapuri, Rajiv Nagar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sumit Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Advocate General
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 16-02-2026 This writ petition has been filed in the nature of a
Public Interest Litigation by one Badal Kumar on the ground
that the respondent No. 7 in respect of whom office order No.
989 dated 08.09.2025 has been issued for running the Asra Grih
Indrapuri, Rajeev Nagar, Patna, does not meet the eligibility
criteria as per the advertisement.
2. Counter affidavit has also been filed by the Patna High Court CWJC No.18744 of 2025 dt.16-02-2026
respondent Nos. 1 to 5. After going through the averments taken
in the writ petition and the counter affidavit, we are of the view
that no public interest is involved. The present public interest
litigation is misconceived.
3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge
the selection of respondent No. 7 by filing appropriate writ
petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of giving
liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in
accordance with law.
(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)
( Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/-
AFR/NAFR N/A CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 18.02.2026 Transmission Date N/A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!