Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Namonath Thakur vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 1960 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1960 Patna
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2025

Patna High Court

Namonath Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 25 February, 2025

Author: Anjani Kumar Sharan
Bench: Anjani Kumar Sharan
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8364 of 2023
     ======================================================
     Namonath Thakur S/o Mayanand Thakur, Resident of Village - Sarara, P.O.
     Sonpatahi, P.S. - Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
     Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar
     Patna,
3.   The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.   The Vice Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University,
     Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.
5.   The Registrar, Kameshwar Singh           Darbhanga       Sanskrit   University.
     Kameshwar, Nagar, Darbhanga.
6.   The Principal, Sanskrit Mahavidalaya, Madeshwar Asthan, Madhubani.
7.   The Principal, Adinath Paras Mani Sanskrit College, Rahua Sangram,
     Madhubani.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Vikas Kumar
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy 1 ( Sc 13 )
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 25-02-2025

              Heard learned counsels for the parties.

      2.      The petitioner prays for the following reliefs:

                      (i) For quashing of the order contained in Memo
                      No.3228 dated 28.10.2022 and corrigendum
                      contained in Memo No.3562 dated 23.11.2022,
                      issued by the Respondent No.3 whereby and
                      whereunder petitioners' appointment made way
                      back in the year 1980 has been held illegal and
                      request of the University to release the amount for
                      payment of arrear of salary since June 2012 has
                      been rejected.
                      (ii) For holding and declaring that respondent no.3
                      was not authorized and competent person to hold
 Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025
                                           2/12




                         the appointment of petitioner illegal and irregular
                         particularly after the superannuation of the
                         petitioner from service.
                         (iii) For direction to respondent authorities to make
                         payment of arrear of salary from June 2012 up to
                         date of retirement i.e. 30.11.2022.
                         (iv) For direction to the respondent authorities to
                         fix pension of petitioner and also make payment of
                         the same including arrears after retirement and
                         gratuity to the petitioner at earliest.
                         (v) For direction to the respondent authorities to
                         make payment of all retiral dues/benefits to the
                         petitioner with interest.
                         (vi) For any other relief(s) for which the petitioner
                         is found entitled to.


         3.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of

         the petitioner is that he was appointed as Second Lecturer in

         Literacy subject after due process of selection in Sanskrit

         College Madneshwar Asthan Madhubani and in this regard on

         16.08.1980

information was sent to the petitioner to submit his

joining. He submitted his joining on 17.08.1980 in this regard to

the Principal of Sanskrit College Madneshawar Asthan,

Madhubani issued certificate vide Letter No.110 dated

17.08.1980 informing to the Registrar of the Kameshwar Singh

Darbhanga Sanskrit University (hereinafter referred as 'the

University') and Secretary Sanskrit College, Madneshwar

Asthan.

4. The University gave its approval vide letter contained in

Memo No.2784 dated 16.09.1982 for appointment of the Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

petitioner for three month on the pay scale of Rs.510-1155 for

temporary basis. Time to Time extension was granted by the

University on appointment of the petitioner. Lastly, vide letter

contained in Memo No.727 dated 29.11.1983 the services of the

petitioner was extended from 01.07.1983 till further order in the

said Madneshwar Sanskrit College, Madhubani.

5. The University in its meeting held on 08.07.2000 made

recommendation to absorb the services of several lecturer by the

internal absorption Committee. In this regard letter was issued

on 09.07.2000. The College of the petitioner became

Constituent College of the University on 28.02.1982. Therefore,

the university published a list of lecturer on 09.07.2000, as who

were working in different Colleges, when those Colleges

become Constituent. The aforesaid list indicated the name of

College, name of Teachers, date of joining, date and number of

letter by which post was sanctioned date of advertisement, etc.

the name of Petitioner finds figures in the said list.

6. He further submits that as per the criteria and process of

selection and absorption, petitioner was discharging his duties.

He was transferred to several places by the University. While he

was posted as Lecturer of Literature at Adinath Madhusudan

Parasmani Sanskrit Maha Vidalaya, Rahua Sangram, Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

Madhubani, the University promoted the petitioner under time

bond promotion after completion of ten years of service vide

notification contained in Memo No. 1864 dated 24.02.2011 in

the light of the recommendation made by University Selection

Committee w.e.f. 01.04.1999 on pay scale of Rs. 3000 to 5000.

7. He was again transferred to Madneshawar Sanskrit

College, Madneshwar Asthan, Madhubani and the headquarter

was fixed at Rajkiyai Sanskrit College, Bhagalpur. Being the

most senior teacher, petitioner was given the charge of In-charge

Principal vide office order contained in Memo No.18775 dated

28.11.2011. Later on, the University revised the pay scale of the

petitioner and benefit of 6th pay revision was given to him.

8. He further submits that the University vide notification

contained in letter no.261/13 dated 11.01.2013 transferred the

petitioner as In-charge Prinicipal of Adinath Madhusudan Paras

Mani, Sanskrit Maha Vidyalaya Rahua Sangaram, Madhubani.

9. The registrar of the University issued office order

contained in letter No.3363 dated 15.06.2013 mentioning

therein that in the light of recommendation and decision taken

by University Selection Committee and keeping in mind of

satisfactory services of temporary teachers their services are

regularized / confirmed from the date given against their name. Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

In the said list name of petitioner is at Serial No.- 4 showing

date of regularization / confirmation as 01.04.1981.

10. He further submits that the petitioner superannuated on

30.11.2022. Accordingly, Principal of the college concerned sent

all the pension related documents to the University for fixation

of pension and other retiral benefits.

11. He further submits that though the petitioner was

discharging his duty on the place of his posting at several

places, the salary of the petitioner from June 2012 till the date of

his superannuation was not paid to him, therefore, he along with

other similarly situated persons approached this Court in

C.W.J.C. No.12290 of 2019 for direction of payment of the

aforesaid salary.

12. He further submits that the C.W.J.C. No.12290 of 2018

was heard and disposed of by this Court vide order dated

09.09.2019 with direction to the University to verify the record

and after verification if it is found that there is no illegality and

irregularity in appointment of the petitioners and the petitioners

are regularly working, the University shall ensure payment of

salary to the period the petitioners have actually worked.

Necessary decision in this regard may be taken by the

respondent at earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

13. He further submits that the University did not act upon

the direction of this Court in the aforesaid writ application,

therefore, the petitioner and others filed contempt application

being MJC No.5075 of 2019 before this Court.

14. In compliance of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No.12290

of 2018, the Vice Chancellor of the University passed an order,

where it was found that the service of the petitioner is legal,

therefore, Registrar of the University vide letter No.7873 dated

21.01.2022 made request to the Director (Higher Education),

Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna for

release of money so that the salary / pension of the teachers may

be made in the financial year 2021-2022.

15. He further submits that petitioner received impugned

order dated 28.10.2022 and corrigendum dated 23.11.2022

contained in Memo No.3288 and 3562 respectively whereby

and whereunder it was held that regularization and approval of

petitioner was illegal and not in accordance with law thus the

request of the university to release the money for payment of

salaries of the petitioner and others vide letter No.73 dated

21.01.2022 was rejected.

16. The University had already passed order and taken Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

decision in regard to the legality and irregularity of appointment

of petitioner and other teachers and request was made to the

State Government to release the fund for payment of salary and

other benefits to the teachers of their constituent colleges but the

State Government rejected the demand of the University vide

impugned order.

17. He lastly submits that the action of the respondent

authorities rejecting the demand of the University to release the

money for payment of salary and other benefits to the petitioner

and others similarly situated teachers is totally arbitrary and

illegal. The petitioner was also not given any notice before

passing impugned order, therefore, the order is in complete

violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

18. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State

Government. It has been stated that the pursuant to the order

passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.12290 of 2018, the

University passed and order on 22.09.2020 and requested the

State Government for release of fund. The State Government

called for the report from the University vide letter No.1956

dated 13.07.2022 with request to attend the meeting on

19.07.2022. The report submitted by the University relating to

the appointment of the petitioner and others were examined and Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

it was found that in view of the order passed in C.W.J.C.

No.12290 of 2018, the illegality and irregularity in the

appointment of the petitioner and others has not been examined

by the University and further the appointment of the petitioners

were made without prior approval of the State Government as

contemplated under Section 35(2) of the Bihar State

Universities Act. The Section 35(2) of the Bihar State

Universities Act, 1976 states that:-

"35. No post for appointment shall be created without the proper sanction of the State Government. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, no University or any College affiliated to such a University, except such college

(a) as is established, maintained or governed by the State Government:

or

(b) as is established by a religious or linguistic minority;

(i) After the commencement of this Act no teaching or non-teaching post involving financial liabilities shall be created without the prior approval of the State Government.

(ii) Shall either increase the pay or allowance attached to any post or sanction any new allowance;

Provided that the State Government may by an order, revise the pay scale attached to such post or sanction any new allowance'

(iii) Shall sanction any special pay or allowance or other remuneration of any kind including ex-gratia payment or any other benefit having financial implication to any person holding a teaching or non-teaching post;

(iv) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, no College other than one mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-Section (1) shall after the commencement of this Act, Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

appoint any person on any post without the prior approval of the State Government.

Provided that the approval of the State Government shall not be necessary for filling up a sanctioned post of a teacher for a period not exceeding six months, by a candidate possession the prescribed qualification. (3) Any appointment or promotion made contrary to the provisions of this Act, or Statutes, Rules of Regulations made there under or made in irregular or unauthorized manner shall be invalid and shall be terminated at any time. The expenditure incurred by the University against such appointment or promotion shall be realized from the officer making such appointment or promotion as a public demand under, the provisions of the Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914.

19. Learned counsel for the State submits that the Division

Bench of this Court in a Judgment reported in 2001 (2) PLJR

817 (Dr. Shiv Narain Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.)

held that only mode of appointment of teachers of affiliated

college is on the basis of recommendation by the commission.

The statutory provision with regard to the mode of appointment

cannot be given go bye on the basis of a provision which is

neither permissible under Act nor has the Statutory sanction in

the sense of competency in the authority concerned to issued

such instruction.

20. He further submits that the service of the petitioner was

not regularized by the University under any of the three statutes

as referred in the Dr. Shiv Narain Yadav (Supra) case. In view

of the judgment passed in the abovementioned case no Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

regularization of a teacher can be made thereafter.

19. The State Government sanction and release grants to the

Universities for payment of salary and pension to the employees

validly appointed and working against the sanctioned post. The

request of the University for allotment of funds for payment of

salary to 43 teachers including the petitioner has been

considered by the State Government and the same has been

rejected vide order as contained in Memo No.2157 dated

21.09.2019 and the Education Department had directed the

University to remove 43 teachers including the petitioner from

service in compliance of the letter of the State Government

dated 19.09.2019.

20. He further submits that the impugned order is in

consonance with the provisions contained in Section 35(2) of

the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976.

21. A counter affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the

University. The University has submitted that the University has

approved temporary appointment of the petitioner but

appointment of the petitioner is without recommendation of

College Service Commission. That for regularization of the

services of the temporary teachers like the petitioner, the

Chancellor has approved three statutes and the service of the Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

petitioner was not regularized under those three statutes.

22. He further submits that since the Education Department

has rejected the request of the University for release of grant,

University is unable to make payment of arrears of salary to the

petitioner as the University is fully dependent on State

Government for release of grant.

23. In view of the foregoing discussions and in view of the

order passed in the Braj Kishor Singh & Ors. Vs. The State of

Bihar & Ors 1997(1) BLJR 625, admittedly, there is no

requirement to take prior approval of the State Government,

when the post is already sanctioned and the petitioner can be

said to be legally appointed as the post was advertised and he

was appointed after facing the interview for daily wages. In

view of the Full Bench judgment, Braj Kishore Singh (supra)

'post facto' approval of the State Government is not required.

24. In the result, I set aside the memo no.3228 dated

28.10.2022 and corrigendum contained in Memo No.3562 dated

23.11.2022, passed by the respondent no.3.

25. The Authorities concerned are directed to pay the monthly

pension to the petitioner and also pay the arrears of pension, if

any, within two months from the date of production of a copy of

this order.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8364 of 2023 dt.25-02-2025

26. It is made clear that the respondent no.3 will be held

responsible for non-compliance of the order within the

stipulated period.

27. With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands

allowed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          07.03.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter