Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1899 Patna
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4786 of 2015
======================================================
Anil Kumar @ Chotan Pandey S/o Late Nawal Kishore Pandey R/o Village-
Bhagwanpur, P.S- Sahebaganj, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, District -Muzaffarpur.
3. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
4. The Superintendent of Police , District- Muzaffarpur.
5. The Incharge, Police Station - Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manish Kumar -3, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Harun Quareshi, A.C. to S.C.-01
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 20-02-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner has questioned the validity/legality of the
order dated 07.06.2007 passed by the respondent No.3 and order
dated 22.12.2014 passed by the respondent No.2 whereby the
authorities have refused to grant the arms licence to the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
arms licence bearing No.272/272 has been issued to the petitioner
by the competent authority. On 01.07.2005, an FIR bearing
Sahebganj P.S.Case No.105/2005 was registered under Sections
326,307 of IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act against the petitioner.
After institution of the aforesaid case, the authority has issued a
Patna High Court CWJC No.4786 of 2015 dt.20-02-2025
2/3
show cause notice to the petitioner why your licence be not
cancelled and petitioner has replied the same.
4. Vide order dated 07.06.2007 (Annexure-1) of the writ
application, the respondent No.3 has dismissed the case of the
petitioner on the sole ground that one FIR instituted against the
petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the
order of the District Magistrate before the court of learned
Commissioner in Arms Appeal No.154 of 2007 which was
dismissed vide order dated 22.12.2014 on the ground that one case
is pending against the petitioner.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
authority has passed the order in haste. In fact the petitioner has
been acquitted in the aforesaid criminal case in S.Tr.No.601/2006
order dated 01.09.2012 and the learned Commissioner has
dismissed the Arms Appeal No.154 of 2007 on 22.12.2014 without
considering the fact that the petitioner has been acquitted in the
pending criminal case on 01.09.2012.
7. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and
perused the material available on the record, the order dated
07.06.2007
passed by the respondent No.3 and order dated
22.12.2014 passed by the respondent No.2 are set aside and matter Patna High Court CWJC No.4786 of 2015 dt.20-02-2025
is remitted back to the respondent No.3 to pass a fresh order in
accordance with law after taking into consideration that the
petitioner has been acquitted in the S.Tr.No.601 of 2006 and pass a
speaking order within a period of three months from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order.
8. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application is
allowed.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.02.2025 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!