Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay Ram vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 1707 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1707 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2025

Patna High Court

Sanjay Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 10 February, 2025

Author: Partha Sarthy
Bench: Partha Sarthy
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Letters Patent Appeal No.710 of 2021
                                          In
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6126 of 2013
     ======================================================
     Sanjay Ram, Son of Jeeta Ram, Resident of Village- Ubhawa Sargunja, P.S.
     Panapur, District- Saran (Chapra).

                                                                     ... ... Appellant/s
                                            Versus
1.   The State of Bihar.
2.   The District Teachers Appellate Authority, Saran at Chapra.
3.   Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Chakia, P.S. and Block Panapur, District-
     Saran (Chapra).
4.   Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Chakia, P.S. and Block Panapur,
     District- Saran (Chapra).
5.   Radhey Shyam Paswan Son of Ambika Manjhi Resident of Village-
     Serukahan, P.S.- Mashrakh, District- Siwan.
6.   Kanhaiya Ram Son of Raghunath Ram Resident of Village- Khajuri, P.S.-
     Panapur, District- Saran, Chapra.
7.   Lalan Ram Son of Shivji Ram Resident of Village- Chakia, P.S. Panapur,
     District- Saran at Chapra.
8.   The Principal Secretary, Vigilance Deptt., Bihar, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Appellant/s      :         Mr. Subodh Prasad, Advocate
                                        Mr. Kapil Deo Singh, Advocate
     For the State            :         Mr. Prabhat Kr. Verma (AAG-3)
                                        Mr. Saroj Kr. Sharma, AC to AAG-3
                                        Dr. Anand Kumar, AC to AAG-3
     For the Resp. nos. 5 & 6 :         Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate
     For the Vigilance        :         Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 10-02-2025

Heard Mr. Subodh Prasad, the learned

Advocate for the appellant, Mr. P.K. Verma, the learned Patna High Court L.P.A No.710 of 2021 dt.10-02-2025

AAG-3 for the State, Mr. Gyan Prakash, the learned

Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and Mr. Anil Singh,

the learned Advocate for the Vigilance Department.

2. The appellant was an unsuccessful candidate

in the selection of Panchayat Teacher which was

concluded in the year 2006. Against such exclusion of the

appellant from being considered favourably and

appointed, he preferred an appeal before the District

Teachers Appellate Authority in 2011, after a lapse of

about five years. The District Teachers Appellate

Authority did not entertain the petition on the ground of

laches.

3. The appellant challenged the order of the

District Teachers Appellate Authority before this Court

vide C.W.J.C. No. 6126 of 2013, which too was dismissed

vide judgment dated 24.11.2021.

4. It appears from the records that the

selection process was concluded in 2006. The appointees

have been rendering their services for the last 18 to 19 Patna High Court L.P.A No.710 of 2021 dt.10-02-2025

years. There had been allegations in the past that the

entire process was vitiated by fraud and bungling, but

notwithstanding the lodging of the F.I.R. against some of

the functionaries of the Panchayat Niyojan Units, the

appointment of those teachers were never disturbed.

5. Entertaining any appeal by the District

Teachers Appellate Authority at that late stage would

have definitely upturned the apple cart and, therefore, we

do not find any fault with the decision of the District

Teachers Appellate Authority in non-suiting the appellant.

6. The learned Single Judge also agreed with

the view of the District Teachers Appellate Authority.

7. The law is well-settled that the Court has to

see whether the petitioner/appellant has been indolent or

lethargic or unconcerned about his own rights.

Entertaining any petition after a long lapse of time would

only bring in its train more inconsistencies and confusion

which would upset the entire process which was taken to

a logical conclusion.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.710 of 2021 dt.10-02-2025

8. We find force in the judgment of the learned

Single Judge in not interfering with the decision of the

District Teachers Appellate Authority, rejecting the case

of the appellant on grounds of limitation.

9. The appeal is dismissed.





                                                        (Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ)


                                                           (Partha Sarthy, J)
Anushka/Rajesh
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          12.02.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter