Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1646 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76316 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Vaishali
======================================================
1. ZEENAT PRAVEEN Wife of Late Saiyed Abu Zafar @ Abu Zafar R/o vill -
Ladaura, P.S. - Kudhani, Distt. - Muzaffarpur.
2. Imteyaz Ahmad Son of Late Saiyed Abu Zafar @ Abu Zafar R/o vill -
Ladaura, P.S. - Kudhani, Distt. - Muzaffarpur.
3. Shagufta Parveen Wife of Asif Iqbal R/o vill - Saidpur Satanpur, P.S. -
Ujairpur, Distt. - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sultana Praveen Wife of Syed Imran Ahmad, D/o Md. Asghar Ali R/o vill -
Chakchameli, P.S. - Hajipur Sadar, Distt. - Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Javed Aslam, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 06-02-2025
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
parties.
2. The present application has been filed for
quashing the order dated 04.11.2022 passed by learned
S.D.J.M., Hajipur, Vaishali, in connection with Mahila P.S.
Hajipur Case No. 24 of 2021, CIS G.R. No. 1225/2022, Tr.
No. 3467 of 2022, where cognizance was taken for the
offences under sections 341, 323, 498A, 307/34 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76316 of 2023 dt.06-02-2025
2/3
3. It is submitted by learned counsel that the matter
between opposite party no. 2 and her husband Syed Imran
Ahmad stands compromised in view of annexures 3 and 4
series of supplementary affidavit as filed on behalf of
petitioners on 12.12.2024.
4. The aforesaid affidavit appears available on
record.
5. The petitioners are in-laws.
6. In view of submission as the maintenance of
opposite party no. 2 appears settled with her husband against
one time payment for sum of Rs. 08 lacs, where their
marriage also stands dissolved as per their personal law, and
as such, the dispute appears amicably settled and, therefore,
in such circumstances continuing with the process against the
petitioners qua in-laws would only amount to an abuse of the
process of the court of law.
7. In this context, guiding note may be import from
legal report of Hon'ble Supreme Court as available through
Abhisek Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in 2023
SCC OnLine SC 1083.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76316 of 2023 dt.06-02-2025
3/3
8. In view of aforesaid, the present quashing
petition stands allowed.
9. The impugned order of cognizance dated
04.11.2022
passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Hajipur,
Vaishali, in connection with Mahila P.S. Hajipur Case No. 24
of 2021, CIS G.R. No. 1225/2022, Tr. No. 3467 of 2022, is
hereby set aside and quashed qua petitioners.
10. Let copy of this order be sent to the trial court,
without delay.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.02.2025 Transmission Date 06.02.2025
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!