Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pradeep Ranjan Pandey vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 2585 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2585 Patna
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Pradeep Ranjan Pandey vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 21 August, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24600 of 2018
     ======================================================
     Pradeep Ranjan Pandey S/o Jai Prakash Pandey R/o Village- Ledri, P.S.-
     Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua

                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                     Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Deptt,
     government of Bihar, Patna
2.   The Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna
3.   The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna
4.   The District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabhua
5.   The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabhua
6.   The Block Supply Officer, Chand
7.   Virendra Kumar Singh S/o Mahatim Singh Village- Dulhi, P.S.- Chand,
     District- Kaimur at Bhabhua


                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Saket Tiwary, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.S.Raza Ahmad -Aag5
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 21-08-2025

1. The Writ petition is filed for the following

reliefs:-

"(i) For setting aside memo No. 692 dated 19.09.2018 issued by the Collector-Cum-Chairman of District Selection Committee, Kaimur to the extent to which the application of the petitioner for selection as PDS Dealer Patna High Court CWJC No.24600 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

has been wrongly been rejected and respondent No. 7 has been appointed.

(ii) For issuance of direction to appoint the petitioner in place of the respondent No. 7.

(iii) For any other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice."

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of

the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System

(Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of

appeal and Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted

Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016

provides for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii)

32(v) and 32(vi) read as follows:

"32 (iii) Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as Patna High Court CWJC No.24600 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days."

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has

an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar

Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016.

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection Patna High Court CWJC No.24600 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

Committee, he cannot review his orders in an

appeal. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a

complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the

same has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the Writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within one month from the

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the complaint/

application shall be condoned by the authority

concerned, and the authority shall dispose of the

same within three months from the date of filing of

the same.

Patna High Court CWJC No.24600 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

7. With the above said observation, the

Writ petition is disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amandeep/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          22.08.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter