Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandeshwar Prasad vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2521 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2521 Patna
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Chandeshwar Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2025

Author: Anshuman
Bench: Anshuman
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12940 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Chandeshwar Prasad Son of Vijali Sah, Resident of Village and P.O. Raghai,
     P.S.- Siwaipatti, District- Muzaffarpur.
                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
1.    The State of Bihar.
2.   The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.
3.   The Additional Collector, Disaster Management, Muzaffarpur, District-
     Muzaffarpur.
4.   Sub-Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur.
5.   Circle Officer, Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur.
6.   Block Development Officer, Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur.
7.   District Public Grievance Officer, Muzaffarpur.
8.   Director, District Rural Development Agency, Muzaffarpur.
9.   Sub-divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, East Muzaffarpur.
10. Head Master, Government Higher Secondary School, Bandhara, Minapur,
    Muzaffarpur.
11. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Raghai, Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur.
                                                          ... ... Respondent/s
    ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Rajeev Ranjan
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Government Advocate (05)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 18-08-2025
                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

      learned counsel for the State.

                        2. The present writ application has been filed

      with the following reliefs:-

                                       (I) For directing commanding the
                      respondent to quash the memo no. 258 dated
                      3.5.2025

(Ann-P/8) by which respondent no.-2, learned Collector, rejected the claim of the petitioner stating therein that petitioner did not run the co-operative mess during flood in between 27.7.2020 to 10.8.2020 at Gram Panchayat Raj, Patna High Court CWJC No.12940 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025

Raghai of Minapur block, Muzaffarpur in year 2020.

(ii) Also for directing and commanding the respondent to pay the dues amount to the petitioner as he was running the co- operative mess successfully during flood in between 27.7.2020 to 10.8.2020 at Gram Panchayat Raj, Raghai of Minapur block in the financial year 2020-21 by the order of Competent Authority i.e. respondent no.-3.

(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions directing the respondents to pay 18% per annum interest on aforesaid dues amount.

3. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that

the petitioner has earlier moved before this Hon'ble Court in

CWJC No.109 of 2024 in which vide order dated 15.02.2024,

this Hon'ble Court has directed to District Magistrate-cum-

Collector, Muzaffarpur to call for the records relating to

grievance of the petitioner and pass order.

4. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has

filed a representation and order has been passed which is

impugned here i.e., contained in Memo No.258 dated

03.05.2025, but still, grievance of the petitioner has not been

settled fully. He further submits that hard earned money of the

petitioner has been paid for the implementation of the Patna High Court CWJC No.12940 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025

Government's scheme for the welfare of the public at large, but

the respondent-State is not making the payment even after

submission of the bill.

5. Counsel for the State submits that a reasoned

and speaking order has been passed and the claim of the

petitioner has not been accepted by the respondent authorities.

6. After hearing the parties, it transpires to this

Court that there is a disputed question of fact involved in the

present case, which may not be decided by this Court.

7. In this view of the matter, the present writ

application stands disposed off, granting liberty to the petitioner

to avail remedy before the competent civil court within 6 weeks

from today.

8. However, trial court is hereby directed to

expedite the matter as earliest as possible.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          20.08.2025
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter