Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Uma Shankar vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2520 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2520 Patna
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Uma Shankar vs The State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2025

Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12873 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Uma Shankar Son of Late Jawahar Lal Pandey, Resident of Mohalla- Ganjpar
     (Mahavir Chowk), P.O. and Police Station- Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura.


                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education
     Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of
     Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Education Officer, Sheikhpura.
4.   The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Sheikhpura.


                                                              ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Ram Sagar Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Standing Counsel (7)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT

     Date : 18-08-2025

                     Heard the parties.

                     2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking

      a direction upon the respondents to appoint him as a Clerk by

      way of promotion from Class-IV post to Class-III post and to

      grant all the consequential benefits for which the petitioner is

      found entitled.

                     3. The petitioner was appointed on compassionate

      ground under letter as contained in Memo No. 792 dated
 Patna High Court CWJC No.12873 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025
                                           2/4




         20.12.2006

issued by the District Education Officer,

Sheikhpura. It is submitted that in the year 2008, the petitioner

had passed his B.Sc. Examination and in the meanwhile, the

Government of Bihar and the Department of Education has

come up with a Letter No. 1971 dated 13.08.2012 providing,

inter alia, 15% of Class-III post to be filled up by way of

promotion from Class-IV post employees.

4. In pursuant to the letter afore-noted, the

petitioner along with other eligible employees filed applications

for their promotion from Class-IV to Class-III post. On being

found eligible, the Headmaster of the said school submitted the

details of Class-IV employees in the prescribed proforma in

response to the Letter No. 1824 dated 25.10.2023 issued by

respondent No. 3. A panel was duly prepared and as per the

seniority of Class-IV employees, the name of the petitioner

figured at serial No. 3. Notwithstanding the 17 vacancies of

Clerk, prior to preparation of panel, further two more post

became vacant in different high schools and thus there were

altogether 19 vacant post. Hence, in any view of the matter,

three post should be filled up in terms with Government Letter

No. 1971 dated 13.08.2012 by promoting the Class-IV

employees on Class-III post. But surprisingly, only two Patna High Court CWJC No.12873 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025

candidates from the panel, namely, Shri Vijay Kumar and

Diwakar Kumar Pandey were appointed and posted as Clerk by

way of promotion under Memo No. 683 dated 13.03.2024. It is

the specific contention of the petitioner that 15% of 19 vacant

post comes to 3 post and thus, in any circumstances, the

petitioner being third in the panel, his name should be

considered for appointment by way of promotion to Class-III

post.

5. Learned Advocate for the State, at the outset,

submitted that the grievance as noted, hereinabove, has already

been put forth before the District Education Officer, Sheikhpura

by filing a detailed representation and he is the competent

authority to look into the matter.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by

the learned Advocate for the respective parties, this Court deems

it appropriate to dispose off the writ petition with a direction to

the District Education Officer, Sheikhpura to consider the

representation of the petitioner as contained in Annexures- 11

and 12 by passing a reasoned and speaking order in the light of

the submissions noted hereinabove as also taking note of the

availability of the vacancies, preferably within a period of

twelve weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of Patna High Court CWJC No.12873 of 2025 dt.18-08-2025

this order, in accordance with law.

7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

disposed off with the aforesaid direction.

(Harish Kumar, J) sauravkrsinha/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          20.08.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter