Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 344 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1835 of 2022
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.810 of 2021
======================================================
Pradeep Kumar Sinha Son of Late Phulan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla 401,
Shreeya Apartment, Ara Garden Road, P.S. - Rupaspur, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary Government
of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.
2. Brajesh Mehrotra the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue
and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.
3. Dr. B. Rajendra the department of Ministry of Secretariat, (General
Administration Department) Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. Dr. Chandrashekhar Singh, the District Magistrate, Patna.
5. Rajesh Mina, the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
6. Kanchan Kapoor, Joint Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land
Reforms, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
7. Naushad Ahmad, A.D.M., Patna cum the Departmental Enquiry
Officer.District Magistrate Office, Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 12-01-2024
None appears for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to
apprise this Court whether orders of this Court has been complied
or not?
3. Be that as it may, I have perused the records. If there
is compliance of the Court order on 27.09.2022 and it has been
placed on record along with the show-cause as Annexure-A.
Patna High Court MJC No.1835 of 2022 dt.12-01-2024
2/3
4. Taking note of compliance order, the present MJC -
contempt petition No. 1835 of 2022 stands dropped.
5. When the matter was taken up in the morning session
the counsel for the petitioner was not present and he has insisted
that he should be heard in the matter. Hence, matter is taken up at
04:15 P.M.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently
contended that the respondents have passed the order of rejection
of appeal in order to frustrate orders of this Court. In this regard, it
is necessary to take note of relevant portion of the order dated
31.01.2022
passed in CWJC No. 810 of 2021 which reads as
under:-
"In the light of these facts and circumstances, the appellate authority is hereby directed to decide the petitioner's memorandum of appeal dated 05.07.2021 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. In view of the aforesaid direction revision petition dated 29.12.2021 of the petitioner stands infructuous. The appellate authority is hereby directed to consider each of the contention raised by the petitioner in his memorandum of appeal and decide the appeal.
With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off."
7. In the light of these facts, this Court cannot go beyond
the aforementioned direction read with the fact that petitioner's Patna High Court MJC No.1835 of 2022 dt.12-01-2024
appeal has been rejected on 03.01.2024. Accordingly, the present
MJC-contempt petition No. 1835 of 2022 stands dismissed.
Reserving liberty to assail the order dated 03.01.2024 before
appropriate forum.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) abhishekkr/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.01.2024 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!