Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Om Prakash Chauhan vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 34 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 34 Patna
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Om Prakash Chauhan vs The State Of Bihar on 3 January, 2024

Bench: Chief Justice, Partha Sarthy

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18020 of 2023
     ======================================================
     Om Prakash Chauhan S/O Balkrishan Chauhan, Resident at Village - Saphi
     Tola (01 darauli), Amarpur, P.S- Siwan, District Siwan, Pin code -841234
     (Bihar) GSTIN No-10ATSPC1564G1Z0

                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Secretary cum Commissioner of state tax,
     Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
2.   The Additional Commissioner, of State tax, (Appeals), Siwan Saran Division
     (Chhapra).
3.   The Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Siwan Circle Siwan, Bihar
4.   The Deputy Commissioner SGST, Siwan Range Bihar.
5.   The Assistant Commissioner SGST, Siwan Range, Bihar

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Raghwendra (GA-11)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

      Date : 03-01-2024

                  The petitioner is before this Court since he filed a

      delayed appeal which is said to have been rejected for reason of

      the appeal having not been filed within the period of limitation.

      Section 107 of the BGST Act provides for three months time to

      file an appeal and a further time of one month in which an

      appeal could be filed with satisfactory explanation, for the delay

      occasioned.

                  2. The appeal filed in the above case was beyond even
 Patna High Court CWJC No.18020 of 2023 dt.03-01-2024
                                           2/5




         the one month period provided under Section 107 of the BGST

         Act and was thus rejected, as seen from the acknowledgment at

         Annexure-6. This Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court have

         held that when there is a specific period provided in the statute,

         within which period a delayed appeal could be filed; then

         neither the Appellate Authority nor this Court under Article 226

         of the Constitution of India could condone the delay beyond the

         period provided.

                     3. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

         has by Notification No. 53 of 2023- Central Tax, dated

         02.11.2023

(S.O. 4767(E)) extended the time for filing appeal

against an order passed by the Proper Officer on or before

31.03.2023 under Sections 73 and 74 of the BGST Act. This in

fact extends the period for filing a delayed appeal beyond the

one month period as provided under Section 107(4) of the

BGST Act, on following the special procedure prescribed under

the said Notification.

4. The special procedure prescribed under the

Notification is seen from paragraph no. 2 to 6 which are

extracted hereunder:-

"2. The said person shall file an appeal against the said order in FORM GST APL-01 in accordance with sub-section (1) of Section 107 of the said Act, on or before 31st day of January 2024:

Patna High Court CWJC No.18020 of 2023 dt.03-01-2024

Provided that an appeal against the said order filed in accordance with the provisions of section 107 of the said Act, and pending before the Appellate Authority before the issuance of this notification, shall be deemed to have been filed in accordance with this notification, if it fulfills the condition specified at para 3 below.

3. No appeal shall be filed under this notification, unless the appellant has paid-

(a) in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and

(b) a sum equal to twelve and a half per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees, in relation to which the appeal has been filed, out of which at least twenty percent should have been paid by debiting from the Electronic Cash Ledger.

4. No refund shall be granted on account of this notification till the disposal of the appeal, in respect of any amount paid by the appellant, either on their own or on the directions of any authority (or) court, in excess of the amount specified in para 3 of this notification before the issuance of this notification, for filing an appeal under sub- section (1) of Section 107 of the said Act.

5. No appeal under this notification shall be admissible in respect of a demand not involving tax.

6. The provisions of Chapter XIII of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 (12 of 2017), shall mutatis mutandis, apply to an appeal filed under this notification."

5. Hence an appeal against an order under Section 73

or 74 has to be filed on or before 31.01.2024, and any appeal Patna High Court CWJC No.18020 of 2023 dt.03-01-2024

filed which is pending before the authority could also be

considered as properly filed, even if there is delay in such filing.

6. However, the maintainability of the appeal is

further regulated by paragraph no. 3 which require that the

admitted tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the

impugned order is paid up along with a sum equal to 12.5% of

the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said

order subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees; out of

which 12.5%, 20% should have been paid by debiting from the

Electronic Cash Ledger. The further conditions in paragraph no.

4 to 6 also shall be applicable.

7. In the present case, the appeal was filed and was

dismissed by the first Appellate Authority. In such

circumstances, it is only proper that the appeal be restored to the

files of the Authority subject to the conditions under paragraph

no. 3 being satisfied.

8. Hence the petitioner would be entitled to satisfy

paragraph no. 3 of the aforesaid Notification by paying up the

deficient amounts as would be required to maintain the appeal

under the notification.

9. We specifically say the deficient amount, since on

filing the appeal 10% of the amount of tax in dispute arising Patna High Court CWJC No.18020 of 2023 dt.03-01-2024

from the order impugned would/ought to have been remitted.

10. We hence direct that on the assessee satisfying the

aforesaid conditions before the time stipulated in Notification;

i.e. 31.01.2024, the appeal filed as seen from the

acknowledgment at Annexure-6 will stand restored and would

be taken up and considered on merits. And if the conditions are

not satisfied, then necessarily the appellate order would stand.

11. We allow the writ petition on the above terms.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

(Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          05.01.2024
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter