Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Saroj Devi And Anr vs Rajesh Pandey And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 200 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 200 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Smt. Saroj Devi And Anr vs Rajesh Pandey And Ors on 9 January, 2024

Author: Arun Kumar Jha

Bench: Arun Kumar Jha

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
            CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.942 of 2017
     ======================================================
1.    Smt. Saroj Devi and Anr wife of Hridya Nand Pandey,
2.   Hridya Nand Pandey, son of Late Ram Pravesh Pandey, Both are resident of
     VillageP.O.- Patedha, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                         Versus
1.   Rajesh Pandey and Ors son of Ramanand Pandey, resident of Village-
     Paterha, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.
2.   Rakesh Pandey, son of Ramanand Pandey,
3.   Most Sumitra Kunwar, wife of Late Ramanand Pandey, Both are resident of
     Village- Paterha, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.
4.   Smt. Usha Devi, wife of Akhilesh Mishra, presently reside at Village-
     Bansohi, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan.
5.   Smt. Renu Devi, wife of Shiv Kumar Upadhyay, presently reside at Village-
     Sonbarsa, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan.
6.   Most. Chandrama Kunwar, wife of Late Sachitanand Pandey, resident of
     Village- Paterha, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.
7.   Smt. Punam Devi, Daughter of Late Sachitanand Pandey, wife of Vinod
     Mishra, resident of Village- Dhanaw, P.S.- Baniyapur, District- Chapra.
8.   Smt. Kanti Devi, wife of Rameshwar Pandey, resident of Village- Baliya,
     P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.
9.   Vishwanand Pandey, son of Late Rampravesh Pandey, resident of Village-
     Paterha, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.
10. Smt. Saraswati Devi, wife of Shree Vishwa Nand Pandey, resident of
    Village- Paterha, P.S.- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :    Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh
     For the Respondent/s   :    Mr.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 09-01-2024

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and I intend

to dispose of this petition at the stage of admission itself.

02. The petitioners have filed the present petition for

quashing the order dated 19.04.2017 passed by the learned Sub. Patna High Court C.Misc. No.942 of 2017 dt.09-01-2024

Judge-III, Siwan in Title Suit No. 739 of 2009, by which the

petition dated 25.05.2016 filed on behalf of defendant-1st set for

recalling the plaintiffs' witness nos. 6 & 9 for cross-examination

has been rejected.

03. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

the petitioner do not stay at the place of litigation and pairavi in

the case was entrusted to other persons and for this reason

plaintiffs' witness nos. 6 and 9 could not be cross-examined.

The learned trial court did not consider the fact regarding

petitioner no. 1 is living outside and petitioner no. 2 being in

Government Service and the rejection of prayer of the

petitioners for recall of the witnesses would cause irreparable

loss to the petitioners. Hence, the order dated 19.04.2017 may

be set aside and the petitioners be allowed to cross-examine the

plaintiffs' witness nos. 6 and 9.

04. Perused the record.

05. Perusal of impugned order makes it amply clear

that on 01.02.2016, the petition filed for recall of plaintiffs'

witness nos. 6 & 9 was rejected by the learned trial court. The

said order was not challenged before any Superior Court and it

attained finality. The petitioner again moved before the learned

trial court with same prayer. The impugned order also reflects, Patna High Court C.Misc. No.942 of 2017 dt.09-01-2024

prior to that, other witnesses were also recalled. It has also come

in the impugned order that recall petition was filed after much

delay.

06. Considering all these facts and circumstances,

particularly, the fact that the earlier order rejecting recall of the

same witnesses was not challenged and continuous filing of

petitions for recalling the same witnesses seems to be a ploy for

lingering the matter, I do not find any merit in the present

petition and hence, the same is dismissed.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          09.01.2024
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter