Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5321 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No 330 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Naresh Kumar @ Naresh (male), aged about 41 years, Son of late Kameshwar
Prasad Srivastava, Resident of Mohalla - Pani Tanki Church Road, Behind
Binda Kothi, PS - Mithanpura, District - Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1 Pritty Srivastava Wife Of Naresh Kumar Resident Of Village- Rajopatti,
Rama Gas Agency Road, Near Dr. R. Pd. PS And Dist- Sitamarhi
2 Arnav, Son of Naresh Kumar
3 Ashmi, Son of Naresh Kumar,
Opposite Party Nos 2 & 3 are under natural guardianship of Prity Srivastav
(Mother), Resident Of Molhalla- Rajopatti, Rama Gas Agency Road, Near Dr.
R. Pd. PS And Dist- Sitamarhi
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amit Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 08-08-2024
Heard. Perused the impugned order, i e, order dated
22.02.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court,
Sitamarhi in Maintenance Case No 44 of 2020 whereby the
learned Principal Judge, Family Court directed the petitioner to
pay monthly interim maintenance of Rs 7,000/- to opposite party
No 1 - wife, Rs 6,000/- to her children and further Rs 1,000/-
towards cost of litigation, i e, total Rs 14,000/- per month. Patna High Court CR. REV. No.330 of 2024 dt.08-08-2024
2 Undisputedly, opposite party No 1 is the legally
wedded wife of the petitioner, opposite parties No 2 and 3 are born
from their wedlock and presently they are residing with their
mother.
3 According to the pleadings, the petitioner is engaged
in a job and is getting a handsome salary. However, no
documentary evidence is available on record regarding salary of
the petitioner and it will be decided only after recording of the
evidence.
4 Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that
opposite party No 1 is also working woman and presently she is
working in a private Hospital but he has also not annexed any
document with the petition or produced before the Principal Judge,
Family Court which shows that opposite party No 1-wife is
working in Nursing Hospital and is getting salary also. This fact
will also be decided after recording the evidence of both the
parties.
5 Since opposite party No 1 is the legally wedded wife
of the petitioner and rest of the opposite parties are their legitimate
children and they are residing separately and are unable to
maintain themselves, therefore, the learned Principal Judge, Patna High Court CR. REV. No.330 of 2024 dt.08-08-2024
Family Court has rightly granted the interim maintenance in their
favour.
6 I, therefore, find no illegality/infirmity in the order of
the learned Principal Judge, Family Court.
7 Resultantly, this revision petition is dismissed.
(Arvind Singh Chandel, J) M.E.H./-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.08.2024 Transmission Date 13.08.2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!