Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Md. Sairul vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 5314 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5314 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024

Patna High Court

Md. Sairul vs The State Of Bihar on 8 August, 2024

Author: P. B. Bajanthri

Bench: P. B. Bajanthri, Alok Kumar Pandey

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Letters Patent Appeal No.1432 of 2019
                                           In
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18023 of 2019
     ======================================================
1.    Md. Sairul Son of Late Damodar Miyan, R/o Village-Kataiya Got Ward no.
      13, P.O. Kataiya Mane, P.S.-Pipara, District-Supaul.
2.   Ram Prasad Mandal, son of Late Babua Mandal, Resident of Village
     Jhakarahi Ward No. 27 Supaul, Police Station-Supaul, District-Supaul.
3.   Gajendra Thakur, son of Late Surya Narayan Thakur, Resident of Village
     Chakala Nirmali, P.O. and Police Station and District-Supaul.
4.   Vivekanand Jha, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Jha, Resident of Muradpur, P.O.
     Muradpur, Police Station Nauhata, District Saharsa.
5.   Bishnudeo Sah, son of Late Baldeo Sah, Resident of Village Chak
     Dumariya, Police Station Karnpur, District-Supaul.
6.   Md. Ahashan, son of late Gulam Rasul, Resident of Mathni Puaranwar, P.O.
     Shukpur, District-Supaul.
7.   Kapleshwar Sah, Son of Late Jagdish Sah, Resident of Village Maricha, P.O.
     Kharal, P.S. and District-Supaul.

                                                               ... ... Appellant/s
                                      Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of General
     Administration earlier known Personal Administrative Reforms, Govt. of
     Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Deputy Secretary, Department of General Administration earlier known
     Personal Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, Supaul.
4.   The Deputy Collector Establishment, District Supaul.
5.   The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Birpur, District Supaul.
6.   The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Division, Water Resources
     Department, Saharsa.
7.   The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Water Resources Department,
     Saharsa.
8.   Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Division, Water Resources Department,
     Saharsa.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Appellant/s    :      Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy, Advocate
                                   Mr. Harsh Anuj, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma (AAG3)
                                   Mr.Saroj Kr. Sharma, AC to AAG3
     ======================================================
 Patna High Court L.P.A No.1432 of 2019 dt.08-08-2024
                                             2/3




       CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
               and
               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
       ORAL JUDGMENT
       (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

         Date : 08-08-2024

                             The appellants have assailed the order of learned

         single judge dated 14.10.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18023 of

         2019.

                             2. Grievance of the appellants are that they are

         entitled for regularization in the light of the fact that they were

         appointed as a daily wager prior to 1990 and their services have

         been dispensed and date of dispensation of each of the appellant

         are not forthcoming. So, we have to draw inference that their

         services were dispensed prior to 16.03.2006 the date on which

         the State have evolved policy relating to regularization of daily

         wager / ad-hoc employees with certain conditions. If the

         appellants fail to fulfill the conditions stipulated for the purpose

         of regularization under the regularization policy dated

         16.03.2006

. Further, if they fail to fulfill the conditions

stipulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs Uma Devi and others

reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 to the extent that daily wager

working for a period of ten years as on 01.04.2006 and against

the sanctioned post and other conditions are stipulated.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1432 of 2019 dt.08-08-2024

3. The learned counsel for the appellants has not

apprised this Court as on 01.04.2006 appellants have completed

ten years of services as a daily wager and so also they were

working against sanctioned post. In the absence of these

materials, learned single judge has rightly dismissed the writ

petitions of the appellants. Hence, no interference is called for in

so far as order of learned singe judge dated 14.10.2019 passed

in C.W.J.C. No. 18023 of 2019.

4. Accordingly, the present L.P.A. No. 1432 of

2019 stands dismissed.

5. Pending I.A.s, if any, stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          12.08.2024.
Transmission Date       N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter