Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shiv Narayan Pandit vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 5309 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5309 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024

Patna High Court

Shiv Narayan Pandit vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 8 August, 2024

Author: Purnendu Singh

Bench: Purnendu Singh

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15118 of 2014
     ======================================================
     Shiv Narayan Pandit son of Late Siyaram Pandit, resident of village-
     Sakarpura, P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria

                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health,
     Government of Bihar, Patna
2.   Joint Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3.   Director, Indigenous Medicine, Department of Health, Government of Bihar,
     Patna
4.   District Indigenous Medical Officer, Khagaria

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Ajay, GA-12
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 08-08-2024
                 Heard Mr. Shiv Kumar, learned counsel appearing

      on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajay, learned GA-12

      appearing on behalf of the State.

                  2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

      petitioner informs that the petitioner has already filed a detailed

      representation for considering his case in light of the several

      orders passed by this Court, including CWJC No.5045 of 1991

      vide order dated 28.07.2008 (Annexure-14), by which this Court

      had directed for considering the service counted from the date of

      take over of the hospital, making it clear that the petitioner of

      the said case would not be entitled to receive salary from the
 Patna High Court CWJC No.15118 of 2014 dt.08-08-2024
                                           2/4




         date of taking over till the date of notification of regularisation.

         However, the period should be counted as period in service for

         the purpose of granting other benefits such as pension,

         promotion etc. It has been informed by the learned counsel that

         the petitioner was superannuated in the year 2015 itself and

         considering that he has rendered his service for more than 10

         years, as a regular employee, he has to qualified for pension and

         the same has to be fixed by the State Government, as per the

         Rule 58 and Rule 59 of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950, which

         deals with the condition of service of a Government servant to

         qualify for pension, may be referred too and the same is

         reproduced hereinafter:

                                 "58. The service of a Government servant does not
                                 qualify for pension unless it conforms to the
                                 following three conditions:-
                                 First- The service must be under Government.
                                 Second The employment must be substantive and
                                 permanent.
                                 Third - The service must be paid by Government.
                                 These three conditions are fully explained in the
                                 following sub- sections.
                                 59. The Provincial Government may, however, in the
                                 case of service paid from general revenues, even
                                 though either or both of conditions (1) and (2) are
                                 not fulfilled-
                                 (1) declare that any specified kind of service
                                 rendered in a non- gazetted capacity shall qualify
                                 for pension;
                                 (2) in individual cases, and subject to such
                                 conditions as it may think fit to impose in each case,
                                 direct that service rendered by a Government
                                 servant shall count for pension."
                          3. Rule 59 of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950

         provides that in certain cases even though the conditions are not
 Patna High Court CWJC No.15118 of 2014 dt.08-08-2024
                                           3/4




         fulfilled, the Government may provide that the service rendered

         by a Government servant shall count for pension. Under this

         provision       the     Government            came   out     with      Memo

         No.Pen1024/69/11779 F., dated 12.8.1969 which is quoted

         hereinbelow for ready reference:

                                         "Regarding:-Declaration of temporary
                                         service of a Government servant who is not
                                         confirmed as pensionable.
                                         Under the existing pension rules, a
                                         temporary Government servant if not
                                         confirmed in any post, is not entitled to
                                         pension unless his services are declared
                                         pensionable under rule 59 of the Bihar
                                         Pension Rules.
                                         2. There are a large number of temporary
                                         Government servants employed under
                                         different schemes which are in existence for
                                         the last 15-20 years and it will cause
                                         hardship to them, if they are not allowed
                                         pension after their retirement.
                                         3. The State Government after careful
                                         consideration have, therefore, been pleased
                                         to decide that, if the service of the temporary
                                         or officiating Government servant who is not
                                         confirmed in any post is continuous and is
                                         more than 15 years, it will be considered as
                                         pensionable under rule 59 of the Bihar
                                         Pension Rules.
                                         4. These orders will be applicable to
                                         Government servants retiring on or after 12
                                         August, 1969. [*Vide Memo No. Pen
                                         1024/69/11779

F., dated 12-8-1969.]"

4. Reading the above provision clearly provides that

even a person has worked in temporary capacity has not been

confirmed, if the service or any post is continuous and is for

more than 15 years, then it may be considered as reasonable Patna High Court CWJC No.15118 of 2014 dt.08-08-2024

under the Rule 59 of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950.

5. Having considered the limited relief sought for by

the petitioner and taking into consideration that the petitioner

has already filed a detailed representation dated 15.07.2014

before the Director, AYUSH, or in alternative, petitioner, if so

advised, may also file a detailed comprehensive representation

for consideration of his case, in light of the several orders

passed by this Court, as well as, as per the paragraph no.4 C (1)

of the Bihar Litigation Policy, 2011. The Authorities must take

action on the representation of the petitioner expeditiously,

within a reasonable period without any further delay. In case,

the petitioner finds that the case of the petitioner is not being

considered, the petitioner is at liberty to take action against the

concerned authority, on whose account, the matter has been

delayed.

6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the

present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/-

AFR/NAFR                AFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          21.08.2024
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter